Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
John of Leiden, was an Anabaptist leader from Leiden, in the Holy Roman Empire's County of Holland.
Answer:
What is the following reading piece to this?
ich habe Scheiße in meinem kurzen?
Explanation:
They established a policy of religious freedom for all inhabitants of Louisiana
1. They were racist. They were offended that a color of person was even allowed to be near them.
2. They wanted to stay the dominant and powerful race. They were afraid that if segregation wasn't legalized, people of color would get "crazy" ideas and overpower them in number and other aspects of life.
