Answer:
they contributed to future conflicts by failing to resolve important issues
Explanation:
The end of WWI and consequently the end of WWII were not enough to end the political and ideological disputes between nations. Europe for the first time was not the strongest Imperialist empire as it was in the past, and two different nations rise to power: The U.S. and the Soviet Union, with different ideological views about society. Because of this, we had different emerging conflicts such as the Korean War, the Vietnam war, and so many others.
They are valuable for the appointive procedure. The two gatherings fill in as a quite decent method for getting similarly invested individuals together. In the event that they were not there, it would be substantially harder to distinguish great competitors, motivate them to keep running for office, bolster them.
They fill in as a contradicting element to the intrigue gatherings. In the event that it were not for parties, the intrigue gatherings would be unopposed. The gatherings attempt to pull individuals together in expansive coalitions. The intrigue bunches attempt to pull them separated on single issues.
President Jimmy Carter based his foreign policy views on human rights. He ended US foreign aid to abusive US allies and was tough on other allies that abused human rights of their citizens.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
a) securing international waters through island hopping
b) finalizing development of an atomic bomb
c) liberating Jews from death camps
d) defeating Germany, then focusing on Japan
e) deploying most Allied troops to Europe
Explanation:
To my understanding, all of them are correct as The Europe First Strategy included ALL of these options.
<u><em>Hope this Helps! Please Mark Brainliest!</em></u>