<h3>
Answer:</h3>
y = (x +2)(x -1)(x -3) . . . . or . . . . y = x³ -2x² -5x +6
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
The graph shows y=0 at x=-2, x=1, and x=3. These are called the "zeros" or "roots" of the function, because the value of the function is zero there.
When "a" is a zero of a polynomial function, (x -a) is a factor. This means the factors of the graphed function are (x -(-2)), (x -1) and (x -3). The function can be written as the product of these factors:
... y = (x +2)(x -1)(x -3) . . . . . the equation represented by the graph
Or, the product can be multiplied out
... y = (x +2)(x² -4x +3)
... y = x³ -2x² -5x +6 . . . . . the equation represented by the graph
Answer: if the width was not effected then the width is still 24 inches
if the area stayed the same, then
find area
area=legnth times width
288=12 times 24
so the new height./legnth =2
288=2 times width
divide by 2
144=width'
the new width =144
Answer:
Both (B) and (C) are correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Explaining in simple terms, The Simpson's paradox simply describes a phenomenon which occurs when observable trends in a relationship, which are obvious during singular evaluation of the variables disappears when each of this relationships are combined. This is what played out when hitmire appears to d well on both of natyraknamd artificial turf when separately compared, but isn't the same when the turf data was combined. Also, performance may actually not be related to the turf as turf may Just be. a lurking variable causing a spurious association in performance.
Answer:
x38
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: (u^2+1) * (u-2) * (u+2)
