Answer:
1) There are 13 students in Jerry's study.
2) There are 39 students in Kathy's study.
3) Jerry's study is more trustworthy!
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Jerry's study is the one with the dot plot.
Now, the number of students is calculated by adding the total number of dots in the plot.
We have a total of 13 dots.
Thus, there are 13 students in Jerry's study.
2) Kathy's study is the one with the histogram.
The total number of students is gotten by adding the corresponding number of students on the y-axis for each range of distance on the x-axis.
Total number of students = 9 + 11 + 7 + 12 = 39 students
3) Jerry's study where he used a dot plot is likely to be more trustworthy because it gives exact values of the number of students for each distance represented whereas, Kathy's study where she used a histogram doesn't give exact values but just gives a range of distances for a particular number of people.
Answer:
p value = 0.039
t = - 2.169
Step-by-step explanation:
Applying the null and alternate hypothesis
using excel worksheet to calculate for ( t and p )
t = -2.169
p = 0.039
from the results obtained
The conclusion is affected by the significance level because : 0.1 < p > 0.01
so when the significance level is = 0.1 the Null hypothesis is rejected and we can say the mean time interval will change while
if the significance level = 0.01 the Null hypothesis is accepted and we can not say the mean time interval has changed because the p -value is greater than 0.01
attached is the excel solution
Answer:
I agree with Elena
Step-by-step explanation:
Ants have 6 legs. Elena and Andre write equations showing the proportional relationship between the number of ants, a, to the number of ant legs, v.
Elena writes a = 6 times v
Andre writes v =1/6 times a.
Mathematically
The number of ants a is directly proportional to the number of legs
=a ∝ v
Because if
1 ant = 6 legs
2 ants = x legs
x = 6 legs × 2
x = 12 legs
The number of ants is directly proportional to the number of legs
Therefore, Elena is correct and Andre is wrong.
The answer is 10.95445 and it is irrational because it is not a full square
