The one reason that the Constitutional Convention decided they needed a document to replace the Articles of Confederation, because the articles outlined an outdated tax system.
Option A
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
The Article of Confederation was replaced because it had many loophole and weaknesses which majorly exploited the Constitution while giving power to the state; more power than the federal government. The Article of Confederation was replaced in 1789 because there was a need for a strong Federal government.
The article was meant to preserve the sovereignty and independence of states. However, during the ratification, it was established that nothing had changed politically since enforcing the Article and even after ratification, things remained the same. It was replaced to strengthen the national government.
I am pretty sure it is because they want their kings to reach afterlife and that they can protect their kings from theives and things
Answer:
This is a very broad topic, but most political scientists would highlight three areas:
Education, Political Culture, Equal opportunities.
An educated society is much more likely to support the plurality of opinions needed for a healthy democracy. Educated citizens are not so easily manipulated.
A democratic political culture of respect and tolerance is also a must. People should be ready to accept when their candidates or opinions are not supported by a majority. Similarly, a majority should understand that democracy is not the dictatorship of a majority.
Lastly, an unequal society might hinder democracy. Political choices are limited for those who face harder conditions.
Explanation: mark most brainliest pls
What often caused great disasters for the Chinese people?
floods
I think <u>it's a good idea that we get conscious as a society about preserving important documents, which safety we may take for granted because they're stored online</u>. However, when it comes to content that is harder to categorize as either public or private, we need to think more carefully about how we make that distinction.
In the past, people wrote stuff on notepads in their home or kept diaries which should be considered private; and you could also write a book and release it or letters to the newspaper which would be considered public. Now we can also do those things but there are platforms that place our information in between, like cloud storage or social media. <u>Is a facebok post private or public?</u>
I believe the law should adapt in order to protect our information against disclosure and make the distinctions between public and private affairs in online platforms more clear to keep a balance.
Hope this helps!
