Answer:
Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war. Still, others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.
Explanation:
i love this question.
Answer:
Ancient civilizations based a large part of their economy and their subsistence on trade and exchange of goods. Thus, they were guided by a very simple premise: they traded what they had left over, to obtain in exchange what they lacked. For example, if a civilization overproduced wheat, it could trade that surplus for goods it did not have, such as animals. In this way, all civilizations covered their needs without the obligation to procure them all by their own hand.
The United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
The British rule in India had mixed blessings. Indians spoke hundreds of different languages, so the introduction of English by the British served to unified Indians with the same language.
Hope this helps!!!
The patient status and lab values are incorrectly matched is that they were Never immunized and ill with measles for 3 days: IgG +/ IgM -
<h3>What test that is used to diagnose measles?</h3>
There is a blood test often done to confirm if the the rash is measles.
The measles virus is one that can be detected or confirmed with a test that is said to use a throat swab or urine sample. People are often misdiagnose sometimes due to different factors.
Learn more about measles from
brainly.com/question/881116
