abina mansah’s is a story, the story of a woman who was illegally enslaved, inform our understanding of gender’s social construction.
Abina was a slave during the period given to Quamina Eddoo for a short period of time. Although she considers herself a slave, she therefore decides to flee her "master" Eddoo towards the shores of Cape Town. Abina and Important Men is an interpretation of the testimony of a young enslaved woman who gained her way to freedom in West Africa in the late 19th century and then sued her former employer.
Conclusion, Abina and the great men are an incredibly valuable resource. The ability to present an accurate and interesting story, provide a different perspective on slavery and its nature in West Africa, and take a new approach to history has made history possible. This graphic is very successful.
Learn more about slavery:
brainly.com/question/14330685
#SPJ4
Answer:
Major General Benjamin F. Butler occupied the city of New Orleans on May 1, 1862. The residents of New Orleans, especially the women, did not take Butler's appointment as military general very well. Butler's troops faced "all manner of verbal and physically symbolic insults" from women, including obvious physical avoidance such as crossing the street or leaving a streetcar to avoid a Union soldier, being spat upon, and having chamber pots being dumped upon them.[12] The Union troops were offended by the treatment, and after two weeks of occupation, Butler had had enough. He issued his General Order No. 28, which instructed Union soldiers to treat any woman who offended a soldier "as a woman of the town plying her avocation."
Explanation:
Can I have brainliest
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
Answer:
European Marxism
Explanation:
Hope this helps. GOOD luck
