1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prohojiy [21]
3 years ago
13

PLEASE HELP!!

Social Studies
1 answer:
icang [17]3 years ago
7 0
If it is something selected in an specific order, like every 25th student of a number of people, is a Systematic sampling because there is a fixed periodical interval (every 25th person). I think this can help you
You might be interested in
Discuss how each of the two main approaches to understanding social problems would explain a social problem like recidivism?
padilas [110]

Explanation:Approaches to the Study of Social Problems

Social Structure as the Basic Unit of Analysis

The Person-Blame Approach

People generally understand social problems as some sort of pathology experienced

by individuals. This approach to understanding social problems is what Eitzen calls

the person-blame approach.

This approach tends to assume that universal norms exist. Behavior is deviant

depending on how much it strays from these norms.

Most people define a social problem as behavior that deviates from the norms and

standards of society.

The system is not only taken for granted; it has, for most people, an aura of sacredness

because of traditions and customs they associate with the system.

From the person-blame approach, those who deviate are seen as the source of trouble.

The obvious question observers ask is, why do these people deviate from norms?

Because most people view themselves as law abiding, they feel those who deviate do

so because of some kind of unusual circumstances: accidents, illness, personal defect,

character flaw, or maladjustment. For example, a person-blamer might argue that a

poor person is poor because he or she is not bright enough to succeed. In other words,

the deviant is the cause of his or her own problem.

The following are examples of perspectives that replay on person-blame approaches.

Cultural Deprivation

Eitzen et al. (2009:16) contends that people who blame the victim often cite

cultural deprivation as the "cause" of social problems. Culture is seen as the

"cause" of the problem. In other words, people who blame the victims see the

culture of the group with the problem as inferior and deficient when compared

to the culture of the dominant group in society.

For example, kids who don't do well is school have parents who don't speak

proper English or who are uneducated.

Recidivism

How successful are Prisons in rehabilitating criminals? Not VERY! Threefourths of the released criminals are re-arrested within four years. Recidivism  

NPTEL – Humanities and Social Sciences – Indian Society : Issues and Problems

Joint initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 2 of 4

refers to ex-offenders who are arrested for another criminal offense once they

have been released from jail.

Why are recidivism rates so high? The person-blame approach might argue

that the fault lies in the characteristics of the individual. Maybe they are

greedy. Perhaps they have higher than usual levels of aggression. Personblamers may also point out the ex-criminals lack of social controls (in Eitzen

et al. 2009:16).

Social Darwinism

The discoveries of Charles Darwin had a profound impact on other branches

of scientific inquiry. Charles Darwin, of course, is famous for his Theory of

Evolution. In the world of biology the species most fit survived while those

less fit eventually became extinct.

Social Darwinism is a distorted view of Darwin's theory. Many social

scientists, most notably Herbert Spencer, attempted to apply the logic of

Charles Darwin to the social world. The essence of the social Darwinist

perspective is that races or cultures, who occupied a "superior position" in the

social world, deserved that position because they were the most socially fit

(Eitzen et al. 2009:18).

According to Spencer "the poor are poor because they are unfit." The poor are

poor because they do not have the intellectual ability to be wealthy.

Spencer argued that "poverty is nature's way of 'excreting ... unhealthy,

imbecile, slow, vacillating, faithless members' of society in order to make

room for the fit" (Eitzen and Baca-Zinn, 1994:170).

Social Darwinists, therefore, oppose social programs because, they argue,

social programs perpetuate the existence of the unfit group who would

probably disappear in the absence of social welfare.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the word when a place that is ruled by a another country
Elis [28]
Various names are used: 
<span>- Dependent territory </span>
<span>- Oversees territory </span>
<span>- Protectorate </span>
<span>- Colony</span>
7 0
3 years ago
what type of weapon is the german u-boat Question 14 options: Battle Ship Destroyer Aircraft Carrier Submarine
Stells [14]
It is a battle ship destroyer
5 0
3 years ago
write for(4)point discussing weather planners of curriculum consider the need of the society before planning it​
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

....☁☁☁☁☁☁☁⚡

☁☁☁☁☁☁⚡☁

☁☁☁☁☁⚡⚡☁

☁☁☁☁⚡⚡☁☁

☁☁☁⚡⚡☁☁☁

☁☁⚡⚡⚡☁☁☁

☁⚡⚡⚡☁☁☁☁

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡

☁☁☁☁⚡⚡⚡☁

☁☁☁⚡⚡⚡☁☁

☁☁☁⚡⚡☁☁☁

☁☁⚡⚡☁☁☁☁

☁⚡⚡☁☁☁☁☁

☁⚡☁☁☁☁☁☁

⚡☁☁☁☁☁☁☁

Shocked!

hahhahahah im sorry you said a 4 point and weather

8 0
3 years ago
Is it apparent that the hammurabi code is clearly the product of a civilization, rather than some other kind of early society? D
frez [133]

Yes, it is apparent that the hammurabi code is clearly the product of a civilization, rather than some other kind of early society, because it was the first written code. The distintion between early societies and civilization is the ability to write and read. The hammurabi code was the first one written, thus making it the first law code of a civilization.

---

Yes, the code illustrate key elements of what a civilization is. The code is perhaps the first example of a codified law, where the principle of "eye for eye" is explained and adjusted in adherence to a variety of circumstances. Moreover, it offers examples of law regarding different matters like weddings, divorce, reproductive law and so on.

---

In Babylonia at the time there were three main social classes, which were property owners, freed men, and slaves. Those classes played a role when it came to the application of the law, as a crime towards an higher class had a greater punishment then a crime towrds a lower class, for example. Euqlity is in this sense was not yet achieved.

---

Yes, the code suggest wide gaps among them. As said before, there were disparities in treatment, whatever the crime was. A property owner that assault a slave was a sever less crime than the opposite case, for example, proving that some wide gaps were present and influenced the everyday life of the population.

---

Very low protection. Babylonia at the time was a very patriarchal society, so the protection of women were reserved to the men in charge of them. It was mostly the men who were refunded in case and the protection extended to women were often written as protection made in order to protected what it was considered mostly like a good.

---

Because women did not have rights on their own body. They cannot decide for themselves and have very restricted possibilities in the society. Mostly, they were considered like a very precious good, and thus they were treated. They could not partecipate in the political or social life and have a very limited role in society.

---

Yes, babylonia had a powerful state with a large bureaucracy. It was perhaps the first state with a large bureaucracy, that was in charge of taxes and justice and other state duties. Bureaucracy also was what allowed the country to expand and extend its influences over a lot of territories, so for a long time bureaucracy was also responsable for making babylonia thriving.

---

Perhaps prisons. They were not a concept back in the day. All charges were resolved at the moment and there were not the concept of prison as a place where people stayed because they have committed a crime. What was present was a system that assure an immediate repercussion on the guilty part, like losing an hand.

---

Because the accusation, if proven true, would lead to an immediate execution of the penalty, thus effectively limited the "guilty" person, so a false accusation was perhaps a tool that many people used when they wanted something and they did not achieve to those results. It was perhaps also used as a vendetta against enemies.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Columbus attempt to appease the increasingly discontented settlers in the Hispaniola?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Union forces change leadership?
    11·2 answers
  • How was life like for African Americans in the South?
    10·2 answers
  • Which president never lived in the white house
    13·1 answer
  • Shifting from producing 500 scarves and 225 sweaters, to producing 100 scarves and 350 sweaters would
    12·1 answer
  • The region that includes the chinook and tillamook indians
    14·2 answers
  • The following are all examples of tropical climates EXCEPT A) savanna. B) rainforest. C) wet and dry. D) continental.
    7·2 answers
  • Josue is an accountant for a mid-sized accounting firm and there are four other people in his department with roughly the same j
    9·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLY
    14·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP PLEASE! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! 50 POINTS
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!