1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Daniel [21]
3 years ago
11

Why did Union forces change leadership?

Social Studies
2 answers:
ss7ja [257]3 years ago
6 0
Mistakes in maneuvers
expeople1 [14]3 years ago
3 0

Union forces changed leadership due to mistakes in maneuvers.

The position of commander-in-chief of the Union Army was occupied, during the war, by the following generals:

Winfield Scott: from July 5, 1841 to November 1, 1861;

George B. McClellan: from November 1, 1861 to March 11, 1862;

Henry W. Halleck: from July 23, 1862 to March 9, 1864;

Ulysses Simpson Grant: from March 9, 1864 to March 4, 1869.

Scott was a former veteran of the Mexican-American War and because of his age he could not perform his duties properly. The war did not go well for the north during the first two years, and many were blamed for the poor qualities of strategist and the excessive caution of Scott's successor, Major General George B. McClellan. McClellan led the disastrous campaign of the peninsula and was replaced by Halleck as commander-in-chief as a result of the poor results. Although popular among the soldiers, McClellan was relieved of his position because of his excessive caution and controversial relationship with his superior, the president of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, being succeeded by Henry W. Halleck, who was preceded by very favorable reports from the western theater, but he was more an administrator than a planner and commander in chief.

Ulysses Grant was the last commander-in-chief of the Union Army. When he was appointed in March 1864 as the new commander-in-chief of the Union Army and Lieutenant General, he had already achieved fame on the occasion of his victories.

Grant supervised the Army of the Potomac (which was formally led by his subordinate, Commander General George G. Meade) in delivering the final hits to the Confederacy through the decisive defeats of the Confederate forces in a series of hard-fought battles in Virginia, culminating in the conquest of the city of Richmond, the capital of the Confederacy.

You might be interested in
Name and explain Two Laws/Legislation that protects citizens against Gender-Based Violence..?​
Vlada [557]

Explanation:

The Domestic Violence Act, the Criminal Law Amendment (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act and the Protection from Harassment Act, all offer notable protection for women and children.

5 0
3 years ago
Joan's mom and dad believe that parents know best. They expect Joan to obey all parental rules without uttering a word, and they
musickatia [10]

Answer:

This question lacks options, options are:A. authoritarian B. permissive C. authoritative. D. uninvolved. The correct answer is A.

Explanation:Authoritarian parents impose rigid rules according to their own criteria, little empathetic, uses one-way communication and are not very affectionate. They tend to establish many rules and norms at home, and are rarely willing to discuss them or accept comments and opinions from others, they apply consequences when the rules are broken, and they can threaten their children or punish them so that they fulfill their obligations. As a result of these authoritarian and undemocratic upbringings, they are also inflexible, rigid, and with very little empathy and social skills.

6 0
3 years ago
In the 1960s, peter berger wrote that pluralism would cause a ________ in which religion would lose its legitimacy as the ______
vfiekz [6]
<span> Peter Berger was an American sociologist and Protestant theologian.</span>
In the 1960s, Peter Berger wrote that pluralism would cause a Crisis of credibility in which religion would lose its legitimacy as the sacred canopy came apart. The result of this pluralism would be psychological malaise and a loss of meaning to life.
4 0
3 years ago
Which was not a criticism of slavery
tresset_1 [31]

One thing that was not a criticism of slavery was that B. slaves can own their own slaves.

<h3>What did people criticize slavery for?</h3>

There were many criticisms of slavery such as the brutal treatment of enslaved people by their masters.

There was also the denial of freedom to the enslaved and the separation of enslaved families. There was no criticism of the enslaved owning other enslaved as this wasn't possible.

Options for this question include:

a. Brutal working conditions.

b. Slaves can own their own slaves.

c. Lack of freedoms and rights.

Find out more on the criticisms of slavery at brainly.com/question/19552123.

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
The colony that Jacques Cartier set up near Quebec failed because of
kipiarov [429]
B) the lack of access to the ocean


All credit to Purplelove651
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is one of the President’s most necessary qualities?
    5·1 answer
  • The Crusades were wars fought by Christians against the pope
    11·1 answer
  • What was Coco Chanel's favorite food?
    14·2 answers
  • _____ is defined as a conflict that occurs when a person re­ceives inconsistent information about work tasks or standards from d
    8·1 answer
  • The 13th Amendment overturned the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision. Which right did this amendment grant? A. It gave women the
    6·2 answers
  • Ascientific theory is an idea supported by research that attempts to explain existing observations or predict new ones.
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP OMG OMG HELP
    7·2 answers
  • Select the boxes in the table to match the beliefs and practices to the religions. Judaism Christianity the Trinity the Ten Comm
    8·1 answer
  • What is a society? Write any 5 features of a society ​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the work of pharmacist in health sector?​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!