1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Norma-Jean [14]
3 years ago
14

Compare life under Stalin's rule rug life under the Russian tsars

History
1 answer:
In-s [12.5K]3 years ago
3 0
The monarchy lasted for hundreds of years in Russia and Stalin's rule was only thirty, there were many different Tsars, cruel ones, enlightened ones, clever ones, pious ones, stupid ones and despotic ones. So I'll compare Stalin to the monarchies of the last two Tsars, Alexander III and Nicholas II. 

<span>Similarities: </span>
<span>Life was cheap - the Tsar and Stalin thought nothing of having political rivals exiled, Stalin was crueler and had more executed. </span>
<span>The State played the biggest role in industrialisation. Under Alexander and Nicholas the country was beginning to industrialise, but the industrialisation was for iron and steel for railways and guns, textiles for uniforms and coal to fire the furnaces of industry. </span>
<span>For the peasants movement was limited, there was an internal passport system, so people could not simply move around if they fancied it. </span>
<span>Both had enormous secret police organisation. </span>

<span>Differences: </span>
<span>The Monarchy was bound up with the Orthodox church; Stalin, despite training for the priesthood, was an atheist and hostile to the church. </span>
<span>The Monarchy was fabulously wealthy, as were most of the aristocracy; Stalin lived a modest life, he had no palaces, no court jeweller and no crown jewels. </span>
<span>The poor were exceptionally poor under the Tsars, the peasants were mostly subsistence farmers not wealthy farmers. </span>
<span>Education under the Tsars was very poor - just 5% were literate; Education was very good under Stalin 95% literacy. </span>
<span>Most people lived in the countryside under the Tsars' they were urban dwellers under Stalin. </span>
<span>Only the aristocracy could have political influence under the Tsars; only party members could have political influence under Stalin. </span>
<span>Women could not be educated, begin divorce proceedings, stand for political office, have an abortion or had many career opportunities; they could do all these things under Stalin </span>

<span>Both were cruel despotisms, Stalin was crueller, but, for those who did not fall foul of the regime, life was better in many ways under Stalin.</span>
You might be interested in
In which branch of the service was the WAC?
zysi [14]

Answer: army.

Explanation: I looked it up and that's all it showed.

7 0
2 years ago
What does National Debt mean
marta [7]
The national debt is simply the net accumulation of the federal government's annual budget deficits. It is the total amount of money that the U.S. federal government owes to its creditors. To make an analogy, fiscal or budget deficits are the trees, and the national debt is the forest.
please mark brainlest!
3 0
3 years ago
How did the colonists' success impact the Native Americans?
olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

European settlers brought these new diseases with them when they settled, and the illnesses decimated the Native Americans—by some estimates killing as much as 90 percent of their population. ... There were even Native Americans shipped out of colonies like South Carolina into slavery in other places, like Canada.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the subject of the book The Courtier? Multiple choice) ​
Katarina [22]

Answer:

1. Etiquette, decorum, propriety imply observance of the formal requirements governing behavior in polite society. Etiquette refers to conventional forms and usages: the rules of etiquette. Decorum suggests dignity and a sense of what is becoming or appropriate for a person of good breeding: a fine sense of decorum.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

4 0
3 years ago
Which is true of the development of western land, timber, gold, and oil?
nignag [31]
<span>All had a negative environment impact.----> TRUE!

The exploitatoin of these resources modified greatly the land and/or the air negetively.

All were abundant, renewable resources ---> they are  not renewable resources


All were carefully regulated ---> there were not regulations when exploitation started

All had been exploited by Native Americans ---> Native Americans didn't exploit those resources. Settlers did.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify teh artistic style being described. The artists broke down and imaginatively reassembled objects with geometric shapes.
    12·2 answers
  • How did the us respond to the Iraq’s aggression
    9·1 answer
  • How did imperialism increase the battlefield of the war
    6·2 answers
  • The composition of the passenger list indicates that these colonists were likely a part of what
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it difficult for historns to study early human societies
    9·1 answer
  • The Innovative Architecture Of Medieval Europe Is Bet Reflected In Which Type Of Structure
    12·1 answer
  • 1.Which of the following sparked the beginning of the Spanish-American War?
    9·1 answer
  • True or False the French Revolution ended with the removal of Robespierre?
    8·1 answer
  • Name two main ideas that jewish law focused on for its people (world history)
    14·1 answer
  • What were the unstated editorial policies of yellow journalism?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!