The purpose of any program is to provide its listeners with good information regarding some topic which has relevance to the listener. Whether this is something political or something scientific totally depends on the programs we're talking about. It also depends on the format in which it will be told.
God, if I could choose, I would say none. All of these lead to inequality (because circumstances vary between many individuals) but I believe prestige should hold the most weight in determining social class. Prestige (which is respect, recognition, or regard) is based on many criteria, including wealth, family background, fame, leadership, power, occupation, and accomplishments. Leadership, power, and accomplishments can both be achieved by any individual with hard work. This is still an unfair balance (gender inequality, racial/ethnical inequality/racism) because of individual factors, it still leaves hope for some people to rise the social ladder.
Western land claim which gave the new settlers a beacon of hope that they could make a future in the west.
<span>The labor movement knew of the need to protect the common interest of workers. those in the industrial sector, organized labor unions fought for better wages, reasonable hours and safer working conditions.</span>
Varied amounts is a good bet. You have a certain amount to pay for objects and bills also have amounts so is easier.
Durable is also good but money can be regained by the bank or job.
Portable is also good but in other times people paid with gold bars which were quiet heavy.
Limited Supply is not it because you need it. So factories keep on producing.
