I think the answer is A
hope it helps :-)
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer: <em>Humanistic</em>
Explanation:
The humanistic model of abnormality is referred to as an approach which states that abnormality tends to occur when an individual is not able to put forth their authentic selves. In accordance to humanistic psychology, individuals put forth their authentic selves only when their social and physical needs and wants are met first.
