Hi there!
Here is the grammar-error free version of your short-story:
On Friday, November 6, 2009, Leo, a pure-bred Shar-peis was born. Leo was born in the spring and within a few weeks of being born could already function like a full-grown dog. Though he was born in a California junkyard, he was very kind and gentle with his brothers and sisters and soon became close with the runt of the family, and that helped him thrive. From the beginning, Leo knew he was special and knew his purpose in life was to help and bring joy to people. When a visitor arrived at the junkyard, his brothers ran and hid but not Leo. He stayed and liked the palms of every visitor he welcomed One day a scientist for dog allergies found Leo or should I say, Leo found him, and it was love at first sight. The scientist's name was Will, and he much enjoyed dogs and although he is allergic to dogs, Leo didn’t cause him to sneeze, although, with so many wrinkles in their fur, they usually tend to make people very allergic. So, Will loaded Leo and his family in the car and went to a friends house to give them the dogs. Will kept Leo after realizing he felt a deep connection between them.
Hope this helped and have a great day!
Character traits of Peter Van Daan are that he is shy, he loves animals, he is socially awkward, less intelligent than Anne, and much more.
Answer:
Twelve years ago, Barack Obama introduced himself to the American public by way of a speech given at the Democratic National Convention, in Boston, in which he declared, “There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America, an Asian America; there’s the United States of America.” Few of us believed this to be true, but most, if not all of us, longed for it to be. We vested this brash optimist with our hope, a resource that was in scarce supply three years after the September 11th terrorist attacks in a country mired in disastrous military conflicts in two nations. The vision he offered—of national reconciliation beyond partisan bounds, of government rooted in respect for the governed and the Constitution itself, of idealism that could actually be realized—became the basis for his Presidential campaign. Twice the United States elected to the Presidency a biracial black man whose ancestry and upbringing stretched to three continents.
At various points that idealism has been severely tested. During his Presidency, we witnessed a partisan divide widen into an impassable trench, and gun violence go unchecked while special interests blocked any regulation. The President was forced to show his birth certificate, which we recognized as the racial profiling of the most powerful man in the world. Obama did not, at least publicly, waver in his contention that Americans were bound together by something greater than what divided them. In July, when he spoke in Dallas after a gunman murdered five police officers, he seemed pained by the weight of this faith, as if stress fractures had appeared in a load-bearing wall.
It is difficult not to see the result of this year’s Presidential election as a refutation of Obama’s creed of common Americanism. And on Wednesday, for the first time in the twelve years that we’ve been watching him, Obama did not seem to believe the words he was speaking to the American public. In the White House Rose Garden, Obama offered his version of a concession speech—an acknowledgement of Donald Trump’s victory. The President attempted gamely to cast Trump’s victory as part of the normal ebb and flow of political fortunes, and as an example of the great American tradition of the peaceful transfer of power. (This was not, it should be recalled, the peaceful transfer of power that most observers were worried about.) He intended, he said, to offer the same courtesy toward Trump that President George W. Bush had offered him, in 2008. Yet that reference only served to highlight the paradox of Obama's Presidency: he now exists in history bracketed by the overmatched forty-third President and the misogynistic racial demagogue who will succeed him as the forty-fifth. During his 2008 campaign, Obama frequently found himself—and without much objection on his part—compared to Abraham Lincoln. He may now share an ambivalent common bond with Lincoln, whose Presidency was bookended by James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson, two lesser lights of American history.
Explanation:
Maybe you have to check yourself and see where the need of improvement is needed.