What was the flaw in the act passed by congress that established a tax on whiskey?

1 answer:

5 0

What was the flaw in the act passed by congress that established a tax on whiskey? a. it rewarded farmers who grew corn b. it did not spread the tax burden evenly** c. it was similar to taxes britan had proposed d. it had to be collected in person by tax collectors
September 29, 2016 by anon

You might be interested in

When did the renaissance reach england and how did it affect english culture

Andrej [43]

Renaissance thought reached England in the 15th century, later than other parts of W.Europe. This was because of England dissociation with Rome and her geographical location.
when the renaissance hit England,it led to emergence of medieval scholars and medieval philosophies that shaped the English society and culture a great deal, in the areas of contemporary arts,literature and government.

8 0

3 years ago

What was the major difference between the french and american revolution?

Alla [95]

The difference was that they ought more thing then they did

3 0

3 years ago

Name 5 natural resources found in Africa

Marina86 [1]

Answer:

Africa is abundant with natural resources, including diamonds, gold, oil, natural gas, uranium, platinum, copper, cobalt, iron, bauxite and cocoa beans.

3 0

2 years ago

Explain ONE aspect of the economic development of China under the Song dynasty that led to the flourishing of commerce that is r

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

Agricultural yields were about 2 tan (a unit of about 110 pounds or 50 kilograms) of grain per mu during the Song dynasty, compared with 1 tan during the early Han and 1.5 tan during the late Tang.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What changes did Augustus make in Rome’s political, military, and social institutions?

Leto [7]

Answer:

Political Institution: Augustus changed the Roman government from an ineffective republic to the principate, by retaining the important powers that were invested in him by the senate during his war with Antony. They saw a threat to Roman power in their refusal to worship Roman gods and as a force of social division.

Military Institution: In regards to the common Roman, Augustus made some rather large and important changes to the military. Previously, the Roman army was an Greek/Italian style army made up by the common man. The average Roman soldier would be a volunteer who might have been a farmer or artisan in everyday life, was untrained, and would serve for around 10 years. Under Augustus, the Roman army was transformed into a true, professional army. Roman legionnaires were highly trained and served for closer to 20 years. Since the army is still made of volunteers, Augustus needed convince young Romans to dedicate their working life to the army. Thankfully for him, his entire reformation process was based around centralizing the Roman focus to the needs of the state, so he was already on his way to building a massively strong army. However on top of that he enacted a few laws that provided benefits for soldiers in the Roman army. For example, Augustus set aside a portion of the Roman treasury for the military treasury, which provided financial support such as pensions for the troops (“Augustan Army Reforms”). With more reason to join the army, Roman men jumped on the opportunity, and once again followed along with the visions of Augustus.

Social Institution: Augustus also enacted social reforms as a way to improve morality. He felt particularly strong about encouraging families to have children and discouraging adultery. As such, he politically and financially rewarded families with three or more children, especially sons. This incentive stemmed from his belief that there were too few legitimate children born from “proper marriages.” On the other hand, he penalized unmarried men older than 38 years old by imposing on them an additional tax that others did not have to pay. They were also debarred from receiving inheritances and attending public games. Augustus also felt that people should not interact with or, especially, marry those outside of their own social class. As such, he created laws that reinforced hierarchical seating in the theatre and amphitheatre. For instance, front row seats were reserved for Senators, the next rows for equestrians, then the rest divided up for young men, soldiers, and so on.

Caesar failed because he was too focused on himself, Augustus succeeded because he turned his focus to the empire despite his manipulation of power.

Explanation:

I hope this helps you in any shape or form.

4 0

3 years ago