In the long history of European colonialism, some colonialists did better by their colonies than others, and the legacy is mostly one of still-enduring pain. For example, virtually no one save Newt Gingrich<span> thinks the Belgians did much of a job in Central Africa, where their mistakes included artificially dividing the population into Hutus and Tutsis, precipitating one of the continent's worst humanitarian disasters. But many historians generally consider the British presence in India, while </span>at times<span> horrifically </span>violent, to be one of the most benevolent and productive in colonial history. Was it a net gain for India? Or did it cause more harm than good? <span>India's democracy is truly extraordinary. ... India's political system owes much to the institutions put in place by the British over two hundred years ago. In many other parts of Asia and in Africa, the British were a relatively temporary presence. They were in India for centuries. They saw it as the jewel in their imperial crown and built lasting institutions of government throughout the country--courts, universities, administrative agencies. But perhaps even more importantly, India got very lucky with the vehicle of its independence, the Congress Party, and its first generations of post-independence leaders, who nurtured the best traditions of the British and drew on older Indian customs to reinforce them.
hope this helps
</span>
Answer:
Because Mussolini lowered unemployment and improved the national economy.
At first, he seems to be doing okay because he created many Extravagant infrastructures for the people in italy.
But, he did that by acquiring many Debts for the government. When he took office, italy has 95 billion lire in debt. After he's done, italy has 405, billion lire of national debt
The answer is letter d. The Supreme Court attacked the New
Deal Programs more than ever. It was
clear that Roosevelt planned gain more support for his programs but many of his
opponents believed that by this he was trying to influence the Courts and even
people who support him were against it.
Answer:
Es un río enclavado en la parte este del continente africano cuya cuenca alberga Uganda, Etiopía, Tanzania, Ruanda, Burundi, Kenia, Sudán, Sudán del Sur, Eritrea, República Democrática del Congo y, por supuesto, Egipto. Está conformado por 2 sistemas fluviales: el Nilo Azul en Etiopía y el Nilo Blanco en Burundi. El primero tiene su inicio en el lago Tana y se une al Blanco en Sudán, a través de unos 1,400 kilómetros. Por su parte, la fuente del Nilo Blanco es un poco confusa; es posible que el río Ruvyronza, un afluente del río Kagera, sea su fuente más remota. Excepto durante agosto y septiembre, el Nilo Azul provee menos del 20 por ciento del agua del Nilo.
Explanation:
The 3/5ths compromise was the law that designated how slaves were to be treated and represented. Previously an African American was counted as only 3/5ths of a person, hence the name of the compromise.
