Answer:
Reduce and more than 15 percent
Explanation:
As Inelastic Demand state that the percentage change in quantity demanded is less than the percentage change in price. Therefore, if the crop is 15 percent higher, farmers will have to reduce the cost of corn by 15 percent to sell the new crop. We know that supply and price share an inverse relationship to reduce sales as supply increases and new crops grow.
Question 30.... are more quantitative and analytical.
The study about High-Paying, In Demand Job Skills, of a global media leading company will lead you to a conclusion that quantitative and analytical traits of an employee is more important than an employee who is computer literate and good at foreign languages. These traits are helpful in any field.
Answer:
$9,760.48
Explanation:
Present value of annuity due = P* [[1 - (1+r)^-(n-1)] / r] + P. Where P = Periodic payment = $1,000, r = Rate of interest per period 4% (0.48/12), n = number of payments 12 (12*1)
Present value of annuity = $1000 * [[1 - (1 + 0.04)^-(12-1)] / 0.04] + $1000
Present value of annuity = $1000*8.760475 + $1000
Present value of annuity = $8760.48 + $1000
Present value of annuity = $9,760.48
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.