<span>The answer is : No coverage for xyx. Bob, an accountant of xyz, drives his own car to the bank to make a deposit for xyz. bob has an at-fault accident. if xyz carries $1,000,000 bodily injury/property damage coverage with a symbol 2 for covered autos, and bob carries no insurance, No coverage is applicable for xyz. </span>
Answer:
US specialisation in TV can be stated on the basis of Absolute Advantage, not comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Absolute Advantage is when a country can produce more output per input of a commodity, than other country.
Comparative Advantage is when a country can produce a good at lower opportunity cost (in terms of other sacrifised)
China can produce more (ie 5 units television) per hour employed, compared to US able to produce lesser (3 units) in the same time. So, on the basis of Absolute Advantage, it can be stated that US should specialise in TV production.
However, since other good's details have not been given. So, we cannot attain the relative opportunity costs. Hence, specialisation on the basis of comparative advantage can't be stated.
C.
The formula for unemployment rate is: Unemployment Rate = Number of Unemployed Persons / Labor Force. The labor force is the sum of unemployed and employed persons. By dividing the number of individuals whom are unemployed by labor force, you'll find the labor force participation, or unemployment rate
<span>If amortisation expenses are spread over 18 years rather than 6 years, amortisation expenses will be lower than they should be. This will cause an increase in net income. In addition, because less of the cost has been expensed, the remaining value of the patent will be too high, thus overstating assets.</span>
Answer:
your answer would be false
hope this helps
:)
