False. While the author can include his opinion, this shouldn't happen very often, as in a research paper, you are supposed to mainly be stating facts.
Because people look to art as an answer
for example each piece of art has a meaning to it
It can be inferred that Beowulf is sure he will win the context against Grendel because " he has the best sword ever made".
<h3>What is the evidence that Beowulf's sword helped him defeat Grendel?</h3>
In the narrative, Beowulf runs to the rear of the cave and discovers Grendel dead. He chops off his skull with the Giant sword.
The blood of those two creatures is so toxic and heated that the metal of the sword blade melts and drips away like an icicle, leaving just the hilt in Beowulf's palm.
Beowulf, the epic's protagonist, is a Geatish hero who battles the monster Grendel, Grendel's mother, and a fire-breathing dragon.
Beowulf's boasts and experiences show him to be the most powerful and capable warrior around. In his youth, he epitomizes all of the heroic culture's greatest virtues.
Learn more about Beowulf:
brainly.com/question/1830314
#SPJ1
You mean about the place library?
Answer:
Cruelty only makes cruelty. The implication is that a harsher sentence would only make people more cruel.
Explanation:
By showing mercy, hopefully, they will learn mercy towards others. By all means, I do not personally agree with this. A person should be held accountable for what they do/did. You have to determine if you think the death penalty is going to solve the problem. Killing someone does not rehabilitate them. Keeping in jail for life can offer them a chance at possibly having a change of heart - even though they are a lifer.
