1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
V125BC [204]
3 years ago
5

How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar

History
1 answer:
Butoxors [25]3 years ago
5 0

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

You might be interested in
Which of these asian countries was once a spanish colony?
Luden [163]
The correct answer would be : b. the Philippines
I hope this helps !
4 0
3 years ago
What was the original purpose of the criminal justice system in the US
alekssr [168]
The original purpose was similar to the purpose it has today. I think the words criminal justice system speaks for itself. A criminal justice system is made for criminal justice. Criminals are people who violate a systems laws and regulations. This harms not only others but a created system of regulation itself. There has to be justice for criminals- this really benefits them in the end.
7 0
3 years ago
PLZ HELP!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! What were the positive and the negative effects of Taft's dollar diplomacy in Latin America?
zhenek [66]

Answer:The United States felt obligated, through the dollar diplomacy, to uphold economic and political stability. Taft's dollar diplomacy not only allowed the United States to gain financially from countries, but also restrained other foreign countries from reaping any sort of financial gain.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Can someone find the answer to this?
asambeis [7]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Washington stayed neutral between Britain and France so there is no way he could have supported the French

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mark each statement if it describes a key characteristic of Greek drama and theater. Choose all answer that's correct. A. Greek
IrinaK [193]
A.greek theater had a circular or semicircular stage calledan orchestra
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In order to stop the spread of industrial technology, Britain
    7·2 answers
  • What did the hebrew scholar ezra help write , which is now consideredthe holy book of judaism.
    11·1 answer
  • In which of the following regions did General MacArthur lead American forces in World War II?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did australia undergo a population boom in the mid 1800s?
    7·1 answer
  • President johnson’s foreign policy was centered on which of the following
    15·1 answer
  • What is nativism and how did it impact immigrant workers? What kinds of legislation were passed
    6·1 answer
  • Culture could be eschanged by:<br> A. Land<br> B. Sea<br> C. Both
    7·1 answer
  • Identify two effects of the Tet offensive and explain how the effects resulted from the offensive
    14·1 answer
  • What
    8·1 answer
  • Who is the father of history​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!