The highest score is the best option upon concluding the multi-criteria analysis .
<h3>What is a multi-criteria analysis' benefit?</h3>
By evaluating the results, performance, implications, and trade-offs of various policy alternatives, a Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) can be used to discover and contrast them. MCA offers a methodical method for supporting complicated decisions in accordance with predetermined standards and goals.
<h3>What is a multi-criteria analysis' benefit?</h3>
Managers can make environmental management decisions that involve trade-offs between a variety of intended management action outcomes with the aid of multi-criteria analysis. Transparent decision modeling begins with clearly specified criteria and hierarchically arranged objectives (particularly when employing qualitative measures).
To know more about multi-criteria analysis visit:
brainly.com/question/14863437
#SPJ4
Answer:
both revenue-oriented and operations-oriented
Explanation:
revenue-oriented pricing can be understood the strategic price level that the producers set to maximize the amount of profit they earn. As it can be seen from the given passage, the company starts noticing more about the earnings, so that they decided to cut down on the discount offering to the customers and set higher price. By that, it can help raise the revenue of the company.
Meanwhile, operations-oriented pricing is price strategy that the company adopts to optimize productive capacity as well as the efficiency of the manufacturing procedure. This is indicated in the actions of expanding fleet of vans and enlarge delivery networks of the company to raise the productivity.
Answer:
The firm’s cash flow (CF) due to financing activities in the second year is - $450 million
Explanation:
As we know that,
Net increase in cash = Operating activity - investing activity - financing activity
where,
Net increase in cash = Ending balance of second year - ending balance of first year
= $280 million - $200 million
= $80 million
The other items values would remain the same
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
$80 million = $1,170 million - $640 million + financing activity
$80 million = $530 + financing activity
So, financing activity = $80 million - $530 million
= - $450 million
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
Flotation costs are cost that are concerned with issuing new common stock. It is the amount of money or cost incurred by an organization when offering its securities to the public. The cost may include legal fees, auditing fees and registration fees. When the flotation cost goes higher, firms are more likely to use debts rather than preferred stock. This is simply because debt is lesser than both common stock and preferred stock. Also, its fallacy to think that preferred stock doesnt have flotation cost. Its only that its not as high as the ones for new common equity.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Yes South Carolina would be compensating David as his property is now economically valueless.
Explanation:
Under the taking clause, 'The Beachfront Management Act was properly and validly designed to preserve South Carolina's beaches', which means that no one will be allowed to do any development project near beaches in order to save the beaches.
Though it is already written in the Act, The Beachfront Management Act barred any further development on the coasts of Carolina, which makes the purchased property of David as economically valuless, so South Carolina would be compensating him as the law has passed and they won't allow further development but they need to compensate the people who purchased the property on the beaches for the purpose of future business.
