Answer:
<em>Helping to transport huge amounts of raw materials throughout England on trains</em>
<em>With fulton’s clermont that enables more efficient shipping</em>
<em>Creating power source for windmills
</em>
<em>Hope I helped</em>
Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.
Explanation:
So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.
For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.
Answer:
In a pure democracy, laws are made directly by the voting majority leaving the rights of the minority largely unprotected. In a republic, laws are made by representatives chosen by the people and must comply with a constitution that specifically protects the rights of the minority from the will of the majority.
Douglas MacArthur decided to land a task force at Incheon, South Korea, to cut off the North Korean supply line and to, not only isolate the North Korean forces in the south, but also to push into North Korea. It was brilliantly successful, and without the intervention of Chinese troops and Soviet military equipment, North Korea would have lost the war.
hope this helps
