Answer:
NPV = 138,347.55
Explanation:
<em>Net Present Value (NPV) : This is one of the techniques available to evaluate the feasibility of an investment project. The NPV of a project is the difference between the present value of the cash inflows and the cash outflows of the project.</em>
We sahall compute theNPV of this project by discounting the appropriate cash flows as follows:
<em>Prevent Value of operating cash flow</em>
PV =A× (1- (1+r)^(-n))/r
A- 23,900, r - 12%, n- 5
PV = $23,900 × (1- (1.12)^(-5))/0.05
=206,769.963
<em>PV of Working Capital recouped</em>
PV = 5600× 1.12^(-5)
= 3,177.59
NPV = initial cost + working capital + Present Value of working capital recouped + PV of operating cash inflow
NPV = (66,000) + (5600) + 3,177.59 + 206,769.96
NPV = 138,347.55
Answer:
3) physical-asset specificity
Explanation:
In a business to business relationship, physical asset specificity refers to an asset, or product or service designed to fit a particular or specialized customer's need.
In this case, True Tomato needs a very specific type of bottle that probably no other ketchup manufacturer may use or want to use. So their bottle supplier specifically manufactures the tomato shaped bottle to meet True Tomato's specific requirements.
Answer:
The correct answer is
: Infants from 1 to 2 years old.
Explanation:
According to the <em>Physical and Cognitive Development</em> theory, plasticity is the ability of the brain to overcome the functionality of injured parts. In this sense, preschoolers with brain language areas damaged are likely to take them up due to plasticity since plasticity is greater in infants from 1 to 2 years old.
Answer:
Business economics often handles the analysis of various costs that business firms incur. Every business always desires to minimize their costs and maximize its profits by embracing different economies of scale. Nonetheless, the firms fail to determine exact costs that are involved in the production process.
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
Compelling-state-interest-test balances the government's interest against an individual's right to be free of law. The test is part of the strict scrutiny analysis and is used as a precedent for future similar cases when the government legitimate interest is at risk.
