1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dahasolnce [82]
3 years ago
7

During World War I, freedom of speech was limited through laws that stopped criticism of the government. In your opinion, why

History
1 answer:
NemiM [27]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

During World War I, freedom of speech was limited through laws that stopped criticism of the government. In my opinion, the Texas government would create these laws to ensure the support to the government and prevent any internal act of treason or disloyalty that could affect the United States' intelligence services and operations during the war.

Those were the years when the US limited freedom of speech to avoid any criticism or defiance that could break the loyalty of the citizens in such critical moments when loyalty and support were much needed.  

You might be interested in
Do people live in the Indus river valley today?
Evgen [1.6K]
Yes, people do live there.  It is in modern day India.  
5 0
3 years ago
Which products were produced in colonial Georgia?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Vegetables , grain, fruit, cotton , tobacco and livestock

7 0
2 years ago
HELP ITS DUE NOW.. We're the Mongolian and ancestral Puebloans successful at getting food?
Serjik [45]

Answer:

The food that the Pueblo tribe ate included meat obtained by the men who hunted deer, small game and turkeys. As farmers the Pueblo Tribe produced crops of corn, beans, sunflower seeds and squash in terraced fields. Crops and meat were supplemented by nuts, berries and fruit including melons.

so i would say yes

Explanation:

░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░

░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░░

░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░

░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░

░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░

░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░ This is Bob

▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀ ░░

▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀ ░░ Copy And Paste Him onto all of ur brainly answers

░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░ So, He Can Take

░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░ Over brainly

░░░░░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄░░

░░░░░░▐▀░░░░░░▐▌░░

░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░█░

8 0
2 years ago
Do you agree with jackson in vetoing the second back of the United States?
kozerog [31]

Answer:President Andrew Jackson, 1832 message to Congress explaining his veto of a bill to recharter the Second Bank of the United States (Peters & Woolley, 2012) Although made 180 years apart, the statements above both reflect a sentiment that goes back to the earliest years of the Republic—allowing monied interests to influence government is a bad idea.

Explanation:

7 0
1 year ago
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP SOON PLEASE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT PLEASE HELP A GIRL OUT
mafiozo [28]
Presidential
Explaining
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What actions led to conflict between colonists in New England and local American Indians?
    10·1 answer
  • Effective solutions to European environmental problems will...
    9·2 answers
  • In what way did china's isolated geography contribute to its development as a country?
    7·1 answer
  • Map coordinates week 5. what two names are given for the lines that run around the Earth from north to south
    9·1 answer
  • *PLEASE ANSWER NEED HELP, I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST*
    12·2 answers
  • Which is the sui dynasty known for? I will mark brainliest.
    11·1 answer
  • Explain the origin of the students for a Democratic society
    13·1 answer
  • Who wrote The Wealth of Nations, a book encouraging free markets, division of labor, and increased productivity?
    11·2 answers
  • Type just the root word for the spelling word into the box below.<br><br> archaeology
    11·1 answer
  • Please help me I don't understand and I don't understand :((<br> (Please don't do it for the points)
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!