1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dahasolnce [82]
2 years ago
7

During World War I, freedom of speech was limited through laws that stopped criticism of the government. In your opinion, why

History
1 answer:
NemiM [27]2 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

During World War I, freedom of speech was limited through laws that stopped criticism of the government. In my opinion, the Texas government would create these laws to ensure the support to the government and prevent any internal act of treason or disloyalty that could affect the United States' intelligence services and operations during the war.

Those were the years when the US limited freedom of speech to avoid any criticism or defiance that could break the loyalty of the citizens in such critical moments when loyalty and support were much needed.  

You might be interested in
What might have happened if they didn't agree to the Mayflower Compact?
Alexus [3.1K]

Answer: The Mayflower Compact created laws for Mayflower Pilgrims and non-Pilgrims alike for the good of their new colony. It was a short document which established that: the colonists would remain loyal subjects to King James, despite their need for self-governance.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Which of these is an example of using a network to communicate an idea? A) reading the news on the internet B) watching an onlin
Veronika [31]
D. sending a text messages on your cell phone
hope this helps
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the penalty for any jew possessing a firearm
Annette [7]
Jews would be denied food and persons refusing to surrender their guns within 24 hours would be executed. If ur talking about nazi Germany
7 0
3 years ago
What was true about President Johnson’s attitude toward Vietnam?
frutty [35]

Answer:

D. He had been against American involvement before becoming president.

Explanation: just saying it might be wrong

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summerize the definition of genocide
timama [110]
Killings directed towards a large group of people
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why would nazis kill people just because they thought they weren’t normal *read the passage to find the answer *
    10·1 answer
  • We advocate a government based on legal principles established in the Koran (Qur'an)." Which political event would most likely b
    11·1 answer
  • True or false ? Victory gardens were used in World Wars I and II to augment the public food supply and aid the war effort.
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following would describe the type of government involvement that was connected to the New Deal? A) a government tha
    11·1 answer
  • What would Sundiata and Mansa Musa have in common?
    11·1 answer
  • Which form of government did many Native American nations establish?
    6·2 answers
  • Andre is observing an arthropod that has three body sections, one pair of wings, three pairs of legs, and a one-way digestive sy
    14·1 answer
  • 6.06 war on the bank- Step One
    15·1 answer
  • Fidel Castro led a revolution in Cuba in 1959 and created a government based on
    7·2 answers
  • HELP HURRY 30 POINTS!!
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!