Its the consent of the people.
Its the people that gives the government to rule.
so its C
If the possible answers are:
<span>a. The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.
b. The events in Rwanda show that genocide has stopped because of the effects of the Holocaust.
c. The events in Rwanda show that the international community has forgotten the impact of the Holocaust.
d. The events in Rwanda show that the international community no longer cares about the effects of the Holocaust.
Then the correct answer is </span>a. The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.
The genocide in Rwanda happened after the holocaust and shows that no matter how hard the community tries, such monstrosities can still happen. The genocide in Rwanda was based around the similar principle as that in Germany. There was a group who perceived that their ethnicity was higher than that of another ethnicity and tried to eliminate them completely.
I believe the answer is a
Answer:
On 1 April 2014, NATO unanimously decided to suspend all practical co-operation with the Russian Federation, in response to the Annexation of Crimea, but the NATO-Russia Council (NRC) was not suspended. this why but i dont no why nato is a threat to russia
Explanation:
