Explanation:
My drawing isn't the best lol.
Good luck!
Answer:
"The incarnation of Jesus"
Explanation:
in other words, the argument was that Jesus, one of the members of the trinity, was "made of flesh and bone" and therefore could be painted, unlike the other parts of the trinity which are argued to be "of the spirit"
in other words, if I may be so brash in my wording, people were more or less like
"you can't draw what you can't see!"
and the catholic church was like
"BUT YOU CAN SEE JESUS, HE HAS A BODY"
(sorry but I just found the simplified argument a bit funny, I'm sitting here imagining my siblings arguing about if ghosts are real again...)
A piece of music where one part echoes or imitates another part is known as a Canon
Not at all! Chinese drawings are often different then ones you will see in rome and so on :) Drawings are diverse depending on the culture they are from.
Answer: True
Explanation:
An archaic word is one that is old fashioned or no longer used contemporarily and that is what the word DOTH is.
In the past Doth was used to refer to the word DO in a present singular third person manner but it's use is no longer widespread.
For example, "She doth nothing wrong" in the present format would be, " She is doing nothing wrong".
