Explanation:
The Mead's article The Social Self, can be categorized as philosophical, psychological and even scientific paper. It is a philosophical paper because it does not have any abstract, intro, methods, results, conclusion. It is more resembles as a very long intro, in fact. It is a psychological paper because as per Mead's The Social Self, he claims that self-consciousness is awakened only in the presence of conflict that causes disintegration of the organization of habit.
In Florida, if a person with PWC is equipped with an engine cut-off lanyard, the person must use this with being able to attach the lanyard to the person itself. It could either be in his or her clothing or the PFD.
Answer:
subatomic particles, protons and neutrons
Explanation:
the nucleus contains two types of subatomic particles which it protons and neutrons.
Answer: In addition to inspecting the fire extinguishers, brakes, steering, electrical wiring <em>the exhaust system will be checked to make sure the system is clear and away from all combustible items. The fuel tanks and fuel lines will also be inspected for leaks. </em>
Explanation:
The vehicle is inspected for all of these things so that the ammo can not accidentally go off or be a fire hazard. Anyone who is in uniform that is going to be handling explosives will be trained in all areas including vehicle inspections. They will be taught in 3 areas of HAZMAT such as general awareness, safety, and function-specific for the drivers.
In addition to checking the vehicle, The vehicle must have a HAZMAT endorsement on their license. The vehicle must contain loads that are blocked and braced. The drivers of the vehicles should always a written ammunition plan. Also, there must clearly label placards placed on the vehicles on all four sides of vehicle.
Answer: Mapp v. Ohio
Explanation: Mapp v. Ohio is a supreme court that ruled the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. On June 19, 1961, the supreme court ruled that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures,” is inadmissible in state courts.
