Yes oh okay this works great for math and debate on homework assignments last week
Answer:
price variance 960.00 F
Explanation:
std cost $6.40
actual cost $6.08 (18,240 total cost/ 3,000 units purchased)
quantity 3,000
difference $0.32
3,00 x 0.32 = price variance
price variance $960.00
The actual cost was below the standard. It cost less to purchase each pound. This variance is favorable
Answer:
The Streaming device - elastic
An elastic good is a good whose demand falls a lot, or proportionally, if the price rises. In this case, the price of the streaming device rose by 42%, and revenue fell proportionally even more, by 59%, thus, the streaming device is a very elastic good.
Cinema ticket prices - Unit elastic
A perfectly inelastic good is a good whose demand does not respond to price changes. In this case, even if the ticke prices were lowered, demand stayed the same because revenue stayed the same.
DVDs - Inelastic
The DVDs are inelastic because even if the prices were raised, demand was not affected, and in fact, it grew. An inelastic good is a good whose demand only responds to price in a limited way.
Interest is capitalized when incurred in connection with the construction of plant assets because, during construction, the asset is not generating revenue
<h3>What is Interest?</h3>
This refers to the amount or rate that is added to a principal amount and this is usually done when a loan is collected.
Hence, we can see that when plant assets are being constructed, interest is capitalized and the main reason why this happens is that the asset is not generating revenue.
Furthermore, actual interest is the only thing that should be capitalized and this is because, during construction, the asset is not generating revenue and therefore companies should defer (capitalize) interest cost.
Thus, Interest is capitalized when incurred in connection with the construction of plant assets because, during construction, the asset is not generating revenue.
Read more about interest capitalization here:
brainly.com/question/417585
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is "First choice"
Explanation:
According to David Parker and Alison Money's Project Leader study, a systematic risk assessment has already shown a shallow grasp of the tools and benefits. One reason that was found in their phenomenologic analysis of the project leaders by David Parker and Alison Mobey2 is that they've had no understanding of the tools and benefits of formal project risk analysis. The lack of formal instruments for risk management is seen by many as an obstacle to the implementation of a risk management program.
