Answer:
given statement is true
Explanation:
given statement of purchase marketable security with the cash have not effect on the organization acid test ratio is true because
the cash and marketable security both will be considered for the calculation of acid test ratio and there is not effect
because change by the cash to the marketable securities
so as that given statement is true
Answer:
Shoe-leather Costs.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Bob manages a grocery store in a country experiencing a high rate of inflation. He is paid in cash twice per month. On payday, he immediately goes out and buys all the goods he will need over the next two weeks in order to prevent the money in his wallet from losing value.
What he can't spend, he converts into a more stable foreign currency for a steep fee. This is an example of the Shoes-leather costs of inflation.
A Shoe-leather costs refers to the costs of time, energy and effort people expend to mitigate the effect of high inflation on the depreciative purchasing power of money by frequently visiting depository financial institutions in order to minimize inflation tax they pay on holding cash.
Metaphorically, it ultimately implies that in order to protect the value of money or assets, some people wear out the sole of their shoes by going to financial institutions more frequently to make deposits.
Hence, Bob is practicing a shoe-leather cost of inflation so as to reduce the nominal interest rates.
Answer: Sales promotion
Explanation: Sales promotions targeted at retailers and wholesale are called trade sales promotions. i think its right
Answer:
$17,000
Explanation:
Leker's Old Property Adjusted Tax Basis = $20,000
To calculate the new basis, subtract the $3000 recieved in cash from the new property.
New Tax Basis; $20,000-$3,000= $17,000
The transaction of Leker to exchange a real property for another led to a loss: Meaning a Property of $20,000 was exchanged for a property of $10,000+ $3,000 (cash)= $13,000
The Loss on the transaction= $20,000- $13,000= $7,000
Due to the loss no gain is recognized and the $3000 will reduce the basis for his new asset.
Answer:
Hutters can be claim two dependents
Explanation:
we know here that Hutters can be claim two dependents
because here given Carla and Ellie as Aaron meets neither the residency nor citizenship requirement
but Carla is a qualifying relative and is under the age of 24
but Ellie is above 24 but is a qualifying relative as scholarship is non-taxable
so
we can say that answer is two
