All categories

3 years ago

It is not possible for abandonment options to decrease a project's risk as measured by the project's coefficient of variation.

Business

1 answer:

Tatiana [17]3 years ago

4 0

This is false abandonment options should decrease a project's risk.

You might be interested in

Dan kim does a lot of customer research on his ideas for new products before actually making a prototype. in the new-product dev

GarryVolchara [31]

<span>the part of the development process where Dan Kim does his research on his ideas is called innovation which is where new ideas are transformed into new products</span>

7 0

3 years ago

Successfulness of the competition policy in South Africa

Gwar [14]

Answer:

Five examples that support successfulness of the competition policy of South Africa are: 1) The product choices along with its competitive prices were provided to the consumers. 2) Practices such as horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was declared unlawful in 1984.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

There are two ways of calculating present and future values when there are multiple cash flows. Both approaches are straightforw

Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

bb bnb hb

Explanation:

mn mn nm mn mn mnbhvgcgfcgcbvcgfcvbvbvbv

3 0

3 years ago

Janice and Shunil are both senior software analysts. They have worked together on projects OF Six years and get along great. Jan

Natali [406]

Answer:

The appropriate response is Option D (Job sharing).

Explanation:

Only by seeking less time can Janice as well as Shunil partake throughout the sharing of jobs, which further enables conventional forty-hour-a-week employment to have been shared between multiple individuals.
The remaining structural solutions were indeed obligations still forty hours each week.

Additional options are not connected with the situation. Thus the answer above is correct.

7 0

3 years ago

A project to build a new bridge seems to be going very well since the project is well ahead of schedule and costs seem to be run

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Schedule variance = $1,428,140

Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = 1.132

Cost Performance Index = 0.801

Explanation:

Planned Value = $1,414,000 + $10,494,000 + $8,494,000 * 53%

= $20,402,000 * 53%

= $10,813,060

Earned Value = $1,414,000 + $10,494,000 + $8,494,000 * 60%

= $20,402,000 * 60%

= $12,241,200

Schedule Variance = Earned value - Planned value

= $12,241,200 - $10,813,060

= $1,428,140

Schedule Performance Index (SPI)

= Earned value / Planned value

= $12,241,200 / $10,813,060

= 1.132

Actual Cost (AC)

= $1,294,000 + $8,994,000 + $4,994,000

= $15,282,000

Cost Performance Index (CPI)

= Earned value / Actual cost

= $12,241,200 / $15,282,000

= 0.801

3 0

3 years ago