All categories

2 years ago

What are the three best comprehension strategies to use when understanding a text breaks down

English

1 answer:

vladimir2022 [97]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

You have to chunk your texts, make your predictions, and preview content.

Explanation:

These three comprehension strategies give the reader a broader vision of the text that can make understanding easier. Chunk text takes portions of the reading and helps the reader see it from a different point through paraphrasing, making predictions and illustrating ideas help both to visualize the actual information and to understand the situation by imagining future events within the context.

You might be interested in

Read the excerpt from "a pair of silk stockings" by Kate Chopin and answer the question that follows.

pychu [463]

I would go with B)second-person

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why is it important to consider future earnings?

Lunna [17]

Answer:

Taxes increasing, food, housing, children, family, sickness, insurance, doctors, and other everyday essientals.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Who is the first human in the world?

Ivenika [448]

Answer:

Adam (religiously)

or Lucy (scientifically; there wasn't really a first human, but if you had to come up with someone, this is what might be considered correct, as it is the earliest remains)

Explanation:

religiously [Judaism/Christianity], the first person is believed to be Adam, created by G*d.

scientifically (based on fossil records and theories of evolution), there was no first "human", or, at least, not in the way you're thinking of.

people, like all other organisms, have evolved from a very distant ancestor. This is called a common ancestor, and it is theorized to be shared by all organisms/life on earth [not the same as plants]. However, this ancestor is not even remotely human, it was likely no more than a worm-like creature.

Over time, different versions of this animal started evolving, and eventually, a species (which began to resemble humans as we see them now). Early Australopithecus would probably be the first "humans"--although, they were not really humans. These were in existence 1-5 million years ago. (This is when religion does not line up with science--we have fossil remains of Australopithecus, and they are not nearly what Adam is described as from a religious perspective, there is literally no possible way for a human to have been that evolved the same amount of time ago-

**This is why I believe that religious texts are theoretical, and were never written to be facts, they were stories that helped people understand morals. I am somewhat religious)

I digress. So, over time, these old distant versions of humans, that were really, really, different from humans evolved. This is why there is no first human, we evolved together.

One of the earliest recorded "humans" was Lucy, an Australopithecus. We don't believe her to be the first human scientifically, because there could be no first human--our existence is evolution, and there is no start to human history--it begins from a place that was not humans.

So, there was no first human, only the earliest recordings of one (which is what we often simplify to be the first human)

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

5. Read the scenario below. Explain what Camilla might do if she was at Level 2 (conventional) of her moral development. Use evi

kari74 [83]

After reading the scenario, we can say the following about Camilla's probable actions at level 2 of moral development:

At level 2 of her moral development, Camilla would most likely report the theft.

Perhaps, in order to help the hungry person, she would give him/her food herself. But still, since at level 2 she has internalized society's moral standards and rules, she would report the theft because that is the right thing to do according to society.

This question refers to Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development, which is comprised of 3 levels. At the second level, which is the level Camilla is at, we accept the notion of right and wrong given to us by others in society.

The three levels are:

1. Preconventional level: when children still have no sense of morality and their decisions are guided by adults.

2. Conventional level: when children accept the moral code and the sense of right and wrong she has learned. Most adults remain at this level.

3. Postconventional level: when the person understands universal ethical principles but makes her own judgments based on her own individual sense of right and wrong.

If Camilla is at the second level, she will most likely conform to society's rules and expectations.

That does not mean she can't understand that there is a hungry person in need. She will likely help this person too, but that will not prevent her from reporting the crime.
In conclusion, having the above information in mind, we can answer that Camilla might report the theft and help the hungry person.

Learn more about the subject here:

brainly.com/question/6470690?referrer=searchResults

brainly.com/question/4309262?referrer=searchResults

7 0

2 years ago

Which of these sentences from this passage shows a shift in the voice? A. Nakamura waited in the dark bathroom and stayed silent

Ivenika [448]

I believe it's B. It seems to be the only one that is very blunt and uses a different tone from the other sentences.

6 0

3 years ago