Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
37.5% of 32 is 12
if you move the decimal point in the percentage 2 places to the left you will get a number you can multiply with
so 0.375 x 32 = 12
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>The missing reasons are:</u>
- 1. k. Given
- 2. j. Definition of parallelogram
- 3. d. Definition of linear pair
- 4. b. Linear pair postulate
- 5. e/m. Definition of supplementary
- 6. g. Same side interior angles theorem
- 7. e/m. Definition of supplementary
- 8. a/c. Substitution property of congruence
- 9. i. Subtraction property of congruence
- 10. f. Alternate interior angles theorem
- 11. l. Alternate exterior angles theorem
- 12. h. Angle congruence postulate
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
