Answer:
1. moderates were the early nationalists and radicles were the assertive nationalists.
2. moderates did not want absolute independence but radicles wanted purna swaraj.
3. moderates had full faith in the British empire but radicals had no faith in them.
4. moderates were in favor of the british empire but radicals believed in the supremacy of indian culture.
Explanation:
:)
Answer:
Explanation:
Dependency theorists explain global inequality and global stratification by focusing on the way that core nations (or high-income nations) exploit both semi-peripheral and peripheral nations (or middle-income and low-income nations). These middle/low income nations are exploited in many ways such as extremely cheap labor and uneducated decision making. This allows resources to flow from these poor and underdeveloped states to a "core" of wealthy states
Answer:
The correct answer is: a. Public compliance; private acceptance.
Explanation:
Public compliance can be understood as the social phenomena that occur when a group of people superficially agree on a particular thing, usually to get social approval.
<u>Private acceptance can be understood as a more personal change in attitude that individuals experience when they are fundamentally convinced of something they may have not seen before, but do not express it loudly and socially. </u>
In this particular case, when the participants of the standard experiments were able to write their responses on a piece of paper, conformity dropped dramatically. This means that during the experiments the level of public compliace were high while the levels of private acceptance were low.
In conclusion, the correct answer is a. Public compliance; private acceptance.
<u>Answer:
</u>
It is a crime and PC 470 and PC 473 are the Penal Code Sections that address this crime.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Any individual who chooses to do a signature in someone else's name on a document that can be deemed as legal in the court of law is committing a crime that is punishable as it is a civil offense.
- Greg's action of signing the document by himself in someone else's name simply because he had acquired an oral consent of the other person is considered by law as a crime under Penal Code 470 and Penal code 473.
