1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nydimaria [60]
2 years ago
15

In what ways did the colonists protest British occupation? Please respond in complete sentences.

History
1 answer:
Tanya [424]2 years ago
5 0

The first reason why the Colonists were there was to either restart their life or to get away from British taxing. When they showed up again to make order they took control of the government and started to tax people(intolerable Acts). The colonists wanted no British presence.

You might be interested in
A country’s leader has recently started making some major political changes. He has started sending the police to constantly spy
Mkey [24]
The answer is letter A. Totalitarianism. In this form of government, the president has the complete authority of every sector of the government. Constituents have no individual freedom and only follow to what they are told to do so. To give an example of a totalitarian government, it would be North Korea, which is run by Kim Jong-un
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help???
natali 33 [55]

Answer:

But the underworld power dynamics shifted dramatically with the onset of Prohibition and the overnight outlawing of every bottle of beer, glass of wine and shot of booze in America. With legitimate bars and breweries out of business, someone had to step in to fuel the substantial thirst of the Roaring Twenties. And no one was better equipped than the mobsters. The gangs were thugs in the employ of the political machines,” says Abadinsky, intimidating opposition candidates and funneling votes to the boss. In return, the politicians and police chiefs would turn a blind eye to illegal gambling and prostitution rings.The term “organized crime” didn’t really exist in the United States before Prohibition. Criminal gangs had run amok in American cities since the late 19th-century, but they were mostly bands of street thugs running small-time extortion and loansharking rackets in predominantly ethnic Italian, Jewish, Irish and Polish neighborhoods.

In fact, before the passing of the 18th Amendment in 1919 and the nationwide ban that went into effect in January 1920 on the sale or importation of “intoxicating liquor," it wasn’t the mobsters who ran the most organized criminal schemes in America, but corrupt political “bosses,” explains Howard Abadinsky, a criminal justice professor at St. John’s University and author of Organize Crime.

“The gangs were thugs in the employ of the political machines,” says Abadinsky, intimidating opposition candidates and funneling votes to the boss. In return, the politicians and police chiefs would turn a blind eye to illegal gambling and prostitution rings.

READ MORE: Al Capone

But the underworld power dynamics shifted dramatically with the onset of Prohibition and the overnight outlawing of every bottle of beer, glass of wine and shot of booze in America. With legitimate bars and breweries out of business, someone had to step in to fuel the substantial thirst of the Roaring Twenties. And no one was better equipped than the mobsters.

Mobsters Hired Lawyers

The key to running a successful bootlegging operation, Abadinsky explains, was a paramilitary organization. At first, the street gangs didn’t know a thing about business, but they knew how to handle a gun and how to intimidate the competition. They could protect illegal breweries and rum-running operations from rival gangs, provide security for speakeasies and pay off any nosey cops or politicians to look the other way.

It wasn’t long before the mobsters were raking in absurd amounts of money and it was bosses and cops who were taking the orders. As the money kept pouring it, these formerly small-time street thugs had to get smart. They had to hire lawyers and accountants to launder the millions in ill-gotten cash piling up each month. They had to start thinking about strategic partnerships with other gangs and shipping logistics and real estate investment.

“They had to become businessmen,” says Abadinsky. “And that gave rise to what we now call organized crime.”

Mafia gangster Dutch Schultz, seen bottom left, in the District Attorney's office after being questioned about a shoot-out with Detectives.

Popperfoto/Getty Images

Before Prohibition, criminal gangs were local menaces, running protection rackets on neighborhood businesses and dabbling in vice entrepreneurship. But the overwhelming business opportunity of illegal booze changed everything. For one thing, sourcing and distributing alcohol is an interstate and even international enterprise. Mobsters couldn’t work in isolation if they wanted to keep the liquor flowing and maximize profits.

Making money was easy, says Abadinsky. The hard part was figuring out what to do with all the cash. Money laundering was another way in which organized crime was forced to get far more organized. When gambling was legalized in Nevada in 1931, loads of Prohibition-era mob money was funneled into the new casinos and hotels. Underworld accountants like Meyer Lansky wired money to brokers in Switzerland who would cover the mobster’s tracks and reinvest the cash in legitimate business. Others, like Capone, weren’t as savvy and got sent up river on tax evasion charges.

BY DAVE ROOS paign aimed at reforming America's worst tendencies, that gave birth to one of the nation

Explanation: IGNORE ALL THAT but girl u looking kind of cute on ur profile pic ;)

6 0
2 years ago
How did the sit-down stoke DIFFER from a traditional strike in which workers walked off of their jobs ?
svetlana [45]

A sit down strike is a strike which has a somewhat nontraditional nature as it is when employees take "illegal" possession of their workplace by committing to a strike at their work stations. Furthermore, employees 'sit-down' at their station but do not work. It is considered a form of civil disobedience. This differs from a traditional strike as in traditional strikes workers walk off their jobs and therefore can be replaced whereas a sit-down strike causes work stations to be occupied and therefore does not allow employees to be replaced easily.

7 0
2 years ago
How did the civil war strengthen the United States
Luba_88 [7]

First, it brought slavery to an end. Slavery ended with the ratification of the thirteenth amendment. Second, it showed Americans that fighting a civil war is not the way to go.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement would web du Bois most likely agree with and Langston Hughes most likely disagree with
stiks02 [169]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mark the statement if it accurately describes New York A. To accommodate the population explosion, the city grew upward. B. Most
    12·2 answers
  • Which act intended to help regulate and trade?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the cabinet? to sign bills into law to review whether laws are constitutional to advise the president on
    8·2 answers
  • History question down below
    10·2 answers
  • Lesson 3: the changing ways of life and thught
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these controls prices and availability in an industry?
    6·2 answers
  • After conquests ended and settlements were built, who stood atop the social hierarchy in spanish america?
    12·1 answer
  • Según Demócrito filósofo pre socrático nos dice que el principio o Arjé es el átomo, nos dice el orden de la naturaleza es
    8·1 answer
  • In this chart’s version of European feudalism, what do the peasants provide in exchange for the king’s and knight’s protection?
    12·1 answer
  • What are all the ranks of the brainly history badges
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!