1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreyy89
3 years ago
10

The art of negotiating or making deals with other countries

History
2 answers:
Zarrin [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Diplomacy

Explanation:

diplomacy is the art of creating and managing relationships among nations and the art of negotiation is that of forging relationships through agreements.

Diplomacy, the established method of influencing the decisions and behaviour of foreign governments and peoples through dialogue, negotiation, and other measures short of war or violence.

Historically, diplomacy meant the conduct of official (usually bilateral) relations between sovereign states.

When you negotiate or broker a deal between two parties who are angry, this is an example of a time where you have shown diplomacy. When a president sits down to talk to the president of another foreign country in order to try to resolve a tense situation, this is an example of a time when diplomacy is necessary.

Yuliya22 [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

diplomacy

Explanation:

i am big brain

You might be interested in
How did La Raza use resistance to live up to our idea of freedom, equality, and democracy?
rjkz [21]
After demanding both political and military action on removing Native American Indians from the southern states of America in 1829, President Andrew Jackson signed this into law on May 28, 1830. Although it only gave the right to negotiate for their withdrawal from areas to the east of the Mississippi river and that relocation was supposed to be voluntary, all of the pressure was there to make this all but inevitable. All the tribal leaders agreed after Jackson’s landslide election victory in 1832.

It is generally acknowledged that this act spelled the end of Indian Rights to live in those states under their own traditional laws. They were forced to assimilate and concede to US law or leave their homelands. The Indian Nations themselves were force to move and ended up in Oklahoma.

The five major tribes affected were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. These were called The Civilised Tribes that had already taken on a degree of integration into a more modern westernised culture, such as developing written language and learning to read and write.

It overturned the more concessionary attitude of ex-President George Washington that aimed for ‘acculturation’ after debate with the Indian Nations. Even in those distant times, there was heated debate in congress with such famous names as the future president Abraham Lincoln and Davy Crockett speaking out against it. Now it is considered with serious negativity by all involved.
5 0
3 years ago
What were the purposes of the "Forward Atlanta"
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

B, C, E, F

Explanation:

The Economy of the New South assignment on edge 2020

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
D
solong [7]

The answer is: Job training and career counseling for people with disabilities.

5 0
2 years ago
After Congress passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965, Group of answer choices many African Americans were elected to office at al
Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

many African Americans were elected to office at all levels.

Explanation:

The Voting Rights Act was passed in 1965 by the Congress. The voting rights act ensured there was no discrimination in the voting process as a result of race , tribe and literacy levels.

When the Act was passed there was a high increase in the number of Africans Americans elected into various offices and posts in the country which was the turning point in the country in terms of inclusiveness of all races.

6 0
3 years ago
How were the result of the tinker and hazelwood cases different?
malfutka [58]

They were different, because in Thinker's case it was ruled in the favor of the students. They had the freedom to publish whatever they wanted, as long as it was not disruptive . In Hazelwood's case it was ruled in favor of the school, because the educators had a power to decide what could be published in student's newspaper.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The image below shows a postage stamp from 1955: An image of a commemorative postage stamp is shown. The stamp reads first of th
    12·1 answer
  • In which of the following regions has the United States been militarily involved, in the 1990s and into the early decades of the
    9·1 answer
  • Which phrases name parts of the Populist Party's program?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the beginning of the World War 2?​
    8·1 answer
  • Why do interest groups most often file lawsuits?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did the united states enter the WW2?
    12·1 answer
  • ... Come mothers and fathers
    14·1 answer
  • The main reason Thomas Paine published Common Sense was to
    11·2 answers
  • 3. Why did some Americans object to the war in Vietnam? (1 point)
    12·1 answer
  • PLS HELP
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!