Answer:
Explanation:
(a) Expropriation has Truly been a major concern for the Government through out the globe, as the when an entity or body which is supposed to work for the good of the poor people by making use of the Government property starts dealing in illegal ways to grab it as private or work on other properties which are private in nature,
b) The European invasion of the many countries across the globe had initially been to gain ,more and more wealth and power through business.
However, it is true that the quality of the institutions colonized by the Europeans is related to whether the climate or the diseases in the colonized regime allowed the European settlers to live in those areas.
(c) It is true that the low quality institutions make it difficult to protect property rights and enforce contracts. The rights of the people are all dependent on how the State allows the people to enjoy them.
(d) It is true that the low-quality institutions are central to the theory of poverty traps that states that countries need a big push to felicitate convergence in living standards to the developed world.
Answer:
internal entrepreneur
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of entrepreneurs, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Nicole is an internal entrepreneur. This term is defined as a person within a large corporation who is taking a direct approach for turning an idea into a profitable finished product, usually by being assertive and pushing through organizational obstacles.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
In order to determine the Macauly we must complete the following table:
period cash flow PV of Period x
cash flow PV cash flow
1 $3 $2.91 $2.91
2 $3 $2.83 $5.66
3 $3 $2.75 $8.25
4 $3 $2.67 $10.68
5 $3 $2.59 $12.95
6 $3 $2.51 $15.06
7 $3 $2.44 $17.08
8 $103 $81.31 $650.48
Total $723.07
Macauly duration = $723.07 / $87 = 8.31
Modified Macauly duration = Macauly duration / (1 + r) = 8.31 / 1.03 = 8.07
Answer:
The Agriculture Department argues that the subsidy increases the "cost" of planting and that it will reduce supply and increase the price of competitively produced agricultural goods.
Explanation:
The department is correct with the agreement that subsidies increase the cost of planting, as the subsidy will decrease with the decrease in area planted and this will increase the output available.
As the subsidy is paid for un-planted area it will be increasing cost, and decreasing quantity of output.
This is clearly true, as they are directly related and this will increase the prices as supply will be low and high demand.
This need to be regulated properly, as no subsidy will discourage farmers, but high subsidies will also discourage farmers.
