<u>Joshua is right because fixed costs are unavoidable but marginal costs are not.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
Decision making plays an important role while considering the development of the organization. The officials in the company should act smartly in making decisions during crucial situation.
<u>Marginal cost </u>is the cost added to the total cost while producing additional units. <u>Fixed cost </u>is the cost of the product that does not change with the increase or decrease in the quantity of the products.
In the above scenario, Jasmine and Joshua were discussing about the cost of the products that are produced in their manufacturing plants. They were discussing about the marginal cost and fixed cost.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": market opportunity.
Explanation:
A market opportunity represents an external factor -typically a problem- that potentially could create a business opportunity for a company. In some cases, the market opportunity pushes firms to innovate in products tailor-made to cover the need in question or to adapt an existing product to that need.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": cost-benefit assessment.
Explanation:
Cost-benefit assessment implies analyzing what the costs and benefits of engaging in business are. The approach aims to minimize losses and maximize benefits. It does not necessarily imply there are not going to be losses during the business cycle but could reduce them as much as possible.
Answer:
6.35%
Explanation:
If you purchase this bond you will need to pay $1,000 x 136.04% = $1,360.40
the coupon rate is 9.5% / 2 = 4.75% or $47.50 every six months
the bond matures in 18 years or 36 semiannual periods
yield to maturity = {coupon + [(face value - market value)/n]} / [(face value + market value)/2]
YTM = {47.5 + [(1,000 - 1,360.4)/36]} / [(1,000 + 1,360.4)/2]
YTM = 37.49 / 1,180.2 = 0.031766 x 2 (annual yield) = 0.06353 = 6.35%
Answer:
C) Atlanta Company
Explanation:
Let's bear in mind that equity is an advantage that allows your company to buy and sell more.
So more equity means more ability to buy and sell and less the possibility of going bankrupt.
Liability on the other hand also gives advantage in trade r company , so more liability shows strongness of the company.
Now let's compare the equity and liability of the both companies
Atlanta Company
Total liabilities $ 429,000
Total equity 572,000
Spokane Company
Total liabilities $ 549,000
Total equity 1,830,000
The equity ratio is about 1:3
While liability is about 1:1.2
So Atlanta company has more riskier structure