1829, having been passed by the supreme court, under the leadership of John Marshall who was a VERY big government man, in 1924.
However, the side he came down on in the Maysville Road veto was that the Maysville Road was totally local and therefore federal funds should not be used for local issues. Then again, he may have opposed the bill simply because Henry Clay supported it and those men hated each other.
So perhaps by his veto of the Maysville Road bill, he was saying he did not agree with Gibbons v Ogden but like I said, to my knowledge, there is no record on how he felt about it (but I am sure he had an opinion because the man had opinions about EVERYTHING
Answer:
Immigrants could be blind.
Explanation: This is because the question asks about immiagrants and it says the immagrant could not be American if they were blind.
Answer:
It lowered the cost of shipping produce from farms to cities
/ Easier to move produce to other areas
Explanation:
I believe the correct answer is B. Washington and
DuBois did not want African Americans to give up on achieving racial equality
in the United States.
Marcus Garvey advocated black separatism as the best
chance for African Americans to prosper (he supported Pan-Africanism and
founded the Universal Negro Improvement Association and African Communities
League (UNIA-ACL)), but Washington and DuBois did not want African Americans to
give up on achieving racial equality in the United States.
The United States had started a war without provocation from another country. is the answer that is correct, but depending on what state you live in they might want <span>The economy was not strong enough to support a war in the Middle East to be the answer</span>
