1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nonamiya [84]
3 years ago
15

Why did the British government create the independent nation of Trans-Jordan in 1921 it wanted to in Trans-Jordan's conflicts wi

thin his real Good Hope to keep nomadic tribes out of Syria it feared the kind of Civil War erupting in Lebanon it promised Egypt's government it would withdraw
History
1 answer:
Vinil7 [7]3 years ago
7 0
Commons

“How did Faulkner pull it off?” is a question many a fledgling writer has asked themselves while struggling through a period of apprenticeship like that novelist John Barth describes in his 1999 talk "My Faulkner." Barth “reorchestrated” his literary heroes, he says, “in search of my writerly self... downloading my innumerable predecessors as only an insatiable green apprentice can.” Surely a great many writers can relate when Barth says, “it was Faulkner at his most involuted and incantatory who most enchanted me.” For many a writer, the Faulknerian sentence is an irresistible labyrinth. His syntax has a way of weaving itself into the unconscious, emerging as fair to middling imitation.

While studying at Johns Hopkins University, Barth found himself writing about his native Eastern Shore Maryland in a pastiche style of “middle Faulkner and late Joyce.” He may have won some praise from a visiting young William Styron, “but the finished opus didn’t fly—for one thing, because Faulkner intimately knew his Snopses and Compsons and Sartorises, as I did not know my made-up denizens of the Maryland marsh.” The advice to write only what you know may not be worth much as a universal commandment. But studying the way that Faulkner wrote when he turned to the subjects he knew best provides an object lesson on how powerful a literary resource intimacy can be
You might be interested in
What are 10 good and bad adjectives to describe Napoleon?
vivado [14]
Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother.  He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic  talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
5 0
4 years ago
Many of the letters in our alphabet come from greek and phoenician letters. How does such an alphabet differ from egyptian hiero
Arturiano [62]
Both egyptian and chinese written languages use pictures as a basis (aka pictographs). On the other hand, our alphabet and the alphabets it stems from base their characters on sounds. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In your opinion, what brought the most cultural advancements to ancient Egypt, and why?
Andreyy89

Answer:

Trade brought wealth to a culture in ancient Egypt.

Explanation:

Without  the canals and rivers, there would not be any route to trade and water to grow crops for food.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did some American leaders oppose proposals to make Hawaii a us state
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

because hawaii technically isnt attatched to the main land

4 0
3 years ago
Why did Pres. Truman believe that political change would come to the Soviet Union?A. The failures of the Soviet Nuclear programB
kolbaska11 [484]
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C. The successes of the U.S. nuclear program."  Pres. Truman believe that political change would come to the Soviet Union because the <span>successes of the U.S. nuclear program</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Louis xiv of france considered himself the sun king because
    5·2 answers
  • After the Romans banished the Jews from Jerusalem, the Romans renamed the city ___________. a. Palestine c. Constantinople b. Ph
    9·2 answers
  • When did the partisan press era take place?
    13·1 answer
  • What economic policy of Great Britain contributed to the rebellion of the colonists against British policies
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
    6·1 answer
  • The Declaration of Independence begins with the phrase “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America.“ Whi
    12·1 answer
  • Pa
    12·1 answer
  • What year was the English Bill of Rights singed?
    9·2 answers
  • Drag each label to the correct location on the image. Identify each source as a primary or secondary source.
    6·1 answer
  • Ano ang ginamit na paraan ng mga Amirekano upang makuha ang tiwala ng mga Filipino? ​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!