Do u have an attachment maybe??
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
We can solve simultaneous equations using substitution method, elimination method or graphical method. But for this purpose, we will be using the elimination method.
3x+4y=8 Equation 1
2x+y=42 Equation 2
Multiply Equation 1 by 2 and equation 2 by 3, so as to get the same coefficient for x
2(3x+4y=8)= 6x+8y=16 Equation 3
3(2x+y=42)= 6x+3y=126 Equation 4
Subtract equation 4 from 3, to eliminate x
6x-6x=0
8y-3y= 5y
16-126= -110
We now have 5y=-110
Divide both sides by 5,
y= -110/5
= -22
Substituting for y in equation 2
2x+(-22)= 42
2x= 42+22
2x=64
x= 64/2
= 32
(x, y)
(32, -22)
Answer:
I think its would be d
Step-by-step explanation:
the distributive property
Answer:
The equations shows a difference of squares are:
<u>10y²- 4x²</u> $ <u>6y²- x²</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
the difference of two squares is a squared number subtracted from another squared number, it has the general from Ax² - By²
We will check the options to find which shows a difference of squares.
1) 10y²- 4x²
The expression is similar to the general form, so the equation represents a difference of squares.
It can be factored as (√10 y + 2x )( √10 y - 2x)
2) 6y²- x²
The expression is similar to the general form, so the equation represents a difference of squares.
It can be factored as (√6y + x )( √6y - x)
3) 8x²−40x+25
The expression is not similar to the general form, so the equation does not represent a difference of squares.
4) 64x²-48x+9
The expression is not similar to the general form, so the equation does not represent a difference of squares.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Think it’s - 1/3 not sure tho
