1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
3 years ago
14

What characteristics do global and regional terrorist groups share, regardless of their various goals?

History
2 answers:
Citrus2011 [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

all terrorist groups have political goals that they try to achieve through violent means

Explanation:

Whitepunk [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:All terrorist groups have political goals that they try to achieve through violent means. so b.

Explanation: hope this helps

You might be interested in
After his debates Lincoln became known as
pochemuha

Answer:

What is often overlooked is that the debates were part of a larger campaign, that they were designed to achieve certain immediate political objectives, and that they reflected the characteristics of mid-nineteenth-century political rhetoric. Douglas, a member of Congress since 1843 and a nationally prominent spokesman for the Democratic party, was seeking reelection to a third term in the U.S. Senate, and Lincoln was running for Douglas’s Senate seat as a Republican. Because of Douglas’s political stature, the campaign attracted national attention. Its outcome, it was thought, would determine the ability of the Democratic party to maintain unity in the face of the divisive sectional and slavery issues, and some were convinced it would determine the viability of the Union itself. “The battle of the Union is to be fought in Illinois,” a Washington paper declared.

Lincoln opened the campaign on an ominous note, warning that the agitation over slavery would not cease until a crisis had been passed that resulted either in the extension of slavery to all the territories and states or in its ultimate extinction. “A house divided against itself cannot stand,” he declared. Lincoln’s forecast was a statement of what would be known as the irrepressible conflict doctrine. The threat of slavery expansion, he believed, came not from the slaveholding South but from Douglas’s popular sovereignty position–allowing the territories to decide for themselves whether they wished to have slavery. Furthermore, Lincoln charged Douglas with conspiring to extend slavery to the free states as well as the territories, a false accusation that Douglas tried vainly to ignore. Fundamental to Lincoln’s argument was his conviction that slavery must be dealt with as a moral wrong. It violated the statement in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal, and it ran counter to the intentions of the Founding Fathers. The “real issue” in his contest with Douglas, Lincoln insisted, was the issue of right and wrong, and he charged that his opponent was trying to uphold a wrong. Only the power of the federal government, as exercised by Congress, could ultimately extinguish slavery. At the same time, Lincoln assured southerners that he had no intention of interfering with slavery in the states where it existed and assured northerners that he was opposed to the political and social equality of the races, points on which he and Douglas agreed.

Douglas rejected Lincoln’s notion of an irrepressible conflict and disagreed with his analysis of the intentions of the Founding Fathers, pointing out that many of them were slaveholders who believed that each community should decide the question for itself. A devoted Jacksonian, he insisted that power should reside at the local level and should reflect the wishes of the people. He was convinced, however, that slavery would be effectively restricted for economic, geographic, and demographic reasons and that the territories, if allowed to decide, would choose to be free. In an important statement at Freeport, he held that the people could keep slavery out of their territories, in spite of the Dred Scott decision, simply by withholding the protection of the local law. Douglas was disturbed by Lincoln’s effort to resolve a controversial moral question by political means, warning that it could lead to civil war. Finally, Douglas placed his disagreement with Lincoln on the level of republican ideology, arguing that the contest was between consolidation and confederation, or as he put it, “one consolidated empire” as proposed by Lincoln versus a “confederacy of sovereign and equal states” as he proposed.

On election day, the voters of Illinois chose members of the state legislature who in turn reelected Douglas to the Senate in January 1859. Although Lincoln lost, the Republicans received more popular votes than the Democrats, signaling an important shift in the political character of the state. Moreover, Lincoln had gained a reputation throughout the North. He was invited to campaign for Republican candidates in other states and was now mentioned as a candidate for the presidency. In winning, Douglas further alienated the Buchanan administration and the South, was soon to be stripped of his power in the Senate, and contributed to the division of the Democratic party.

DONT PUT ALL OF THIS JUST READ THOUE IT AND YOU WILL KNOW WHAT IS WAS KNOWN FOR! PLS MAKE MY BRAINLYEST PLS

8 0
2 years ago
The removal of people to internment camps during World War II was based solely on
Sholpan [36]
I think it’s a person’s citizenship status but i might be wrong
5 0
2 years ago
To what extent was the role of the Supreme Court mapped out by John Marshall different from the role envisioned for the court by
sasho [114]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options provided, we can say the following.

John Marshall's approach was different from the role envisioned for the court by the writers of the Constitution in that Marshall believed the United States Constitution granted strong federal powers; Jefferson did not.

John Marshall was a federalist. Thomas Jefferson was not. He was an anti-federalist. Then, Marshall considered the idea of a strong central government. On the other side, Jefferson thought that a strong government was not the better option for a new nation, and even worse, a strong federal government could turn into a tyranny.

3 0
3 years ago
HELP 1ST PERSON GETS BRAINLYEST
BaLLatris [955]

Answer:

it caused them to be free and get jobs

6 0
2 years ago
Which is true?
erik [133]

Answer:

The first is true, and so is the 3rd so I would go with all of the above.

Explanation:

Alvin York killed 20 German soldiers and almost single handedly took 132 prisoner. He is renowned for his bravery and his strong Christian Faith. Cher Ami was a French pigeon donated by the British to carry messages.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lauren is studying for her final exam in her psychology class. For every 45 minutes that she studies, she gives herself a mini d
    9·1 answer
  • Funding for the staging of the 1996 Summer Olympic Games in Atlanta came from
    15·1 answer
  • What organization fought for an equal rights amendment to the constitution
    12·1 answer
  • What political changes occurred as a result of the crusades?
    15·1 answer
  • Why was it hard for Muhammad to find a new leader
    13·1 answer
  • How long did Chinese rule of Vietnam last?
    7·2 answers
  • Why were Native Americans ultimately not chosen by European settlers as primary source of unpaid slave labor?
    11·1 answer
  • Explain how an ecosystem that has experienced a disruptive event, such as a volcano, recovers. << Read Less
    13·1 answer
  • How did the Civil Rights movement challenge America to rethink what it really by freedom ?
    6·1 answer
  • What dothe traditions in kookaburra suggest about the community
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!