Answer:
An increase in Price and decrease in Quantity.
Explanation:
Please see the attached Decrease in Supply when Demand is Constant Diagram for further explanation:
<em>Supply Curve </em>is always upward because Supply and Price are directly proportional as shown in attached diagram as S
.
<em>Demand Curve</em> is always downward because Demand and Price are inversely proportional as shown in attached diagram as D
.
The point where Demand Curve and Supply curves meet each other or intersect each other is called <em>Equilibrium </em>as shown in the attached diagram as E. At this the point Quantity Demanded and Quantity Supplied are equal.
The point at which Equilibrium touches the price is called Equilibrium Price as shown in the attached Diagram as P. At this point the Quantity Demanded and Quantity Supplied are equal.
The Point at which Equilibrium touches the quantity is called <em>Equilibrium Quantity</em> as shown in the attached Diagram as Q. At this point the Quantity Demanded and Quantity Supplied are equal.
Since the Demand is constant D and Supply is decreasing, So when the Supply decreases it shifts towards its left side as shown in the attached diagram as S'.
After decrease in Supply the changes it brings a new Equilibrium point as E' at which Equilibrium Price rises to P' and Equilibrium Quantity falls to Q' as shown in the attached diagram. At this point the Quantity Demanded and Quantity Supplied are equal.
The answer is<u> "longitudinal design".</u>
A longitudinal study is a research design that includes rehashed perceptions of similar factors (e.g., individuals) over short or significant lots of time (i.e., utilizes longitudinal information). Usually a kind of observational examination, despite the fact that they can likewise be organized as longitudinal randomized experiments. Longitudinal studies about in this manner roll out watching improvements more precise and are connected in different fields.
Matthew manages the sales team at an information technology (IT) firm. His focus is to conduct business in accordance with his firm's mission and vision, while making as much money as possible for the firm and conforming to the basic rules of the society. He ensures that his actions embody ethical custom. In this scenario, Matthew's view of corporate social responsibility is most likely rooted in the <u>Utilitarian </u>tradition.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a ethical theory which talks about the right and the wrong actions of an individual.This theory advocates that the action that brings happiness to the society and also increases the utility in the society as a whole is called a morally correct action.
This theory was proposed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.
In simple words an action is termed as right if it promotes happiness in the society and is termed bad it it brings unhappiness in the society
So we can say that Matthew's view of corporate social responsibility is most likely rooted in the <u>Utilitarian </u>tradition.
Answer: Most tax breaks reduce taxable income, but reducing taxable income below zero does not reduce the tax bill.
Explanation:
Tax breaks can be used to reduce your taxable income sometimes all the way to zero. This however simply means that you don't have to pay income tax but does not mean that there won't be other taxes to pay.
Because of these additional taxes left to pay, a person will still pay certain taxes even if their taxable income is below zero. Tax expenditures therefore do not help much with a federal tax bill of zero.
Answer:
<em>2.statute.</em>
Explanation:
<em>The court ruling will be decided by the contractual agreement signed by the three parties. A Limited Liability Agreement will usually be demonstrated by three parties signing a contract together. </em>
The situation will become difficult once, within each partner, there is no written statement about the distribution of profit. Every partner must obtain the suitable yield rate, based on their original investment.
The verdict begins to appear as if it falls into the hands of the state. By considering the Revised Uniform Partnership Act-Section 306. It relies heavily on where the business is registered, authorized, type of business.
However, John is the majority shareholder with 60 per cent of financial and legal accountability[ which is why he owes more to investment return]. It is also partly due to unlawful double tax laws and they are intended to protect the owner / partner of the business.
The confusion could've been avoided if an attorney and bookkeeper were available to describe the process, before the agreement was made and/or written. The condition they submit for incorporation makes a huge difference however, it does not seem to be the circumstance.