When nations gained independence from colonial powers, the reason why some were able to transition quite peacefully while others were experiencing violence and upheaval was that there were different interest groups in terms of what they wanted from a specific country.
In essence, where nations didn't transit to self-rule peacefully, other nations could have made sure that they would be able to transition peacefully through different ways of helping their fellow neighbouring nations.
The uprisings led to little political change but had a significant social and cultural change. Some reforms lasted and brought with them certain changes such as the abolition of serfdom in Austria and Hungary, the end of absolute monarchy in Denmark, and the introduction of representative democracy in the Netherlands.
Answer:
The history of immigration to the United States details the movement of people to the United States starting with the first European settlements from around 1600. Beginning around this time, British and other Europeans settled primarily on the east coast. In 1619, Africans began being imported as slaves. The United States experienced successive waves of immigration, particularly from Europe. Immigrants sometimes paid the cost of transoceanic transportation by becoming indentured servants after their arrival in the New World. Later, immigration rules became more restrictive; the ending of numerical restrictions occurred in 1965. Recently, cheap air travel has increased immigration from Asia and Latin America.
Attitudes towards new immigrants have cycled between favorable and hostile since the 1790s.
Explanation:
this is all history of emigrationon to usa or america
Hey there!
In the times where there were still Etruscan Kings ruling Rome before the times of the republic, and even after, society was divided by two classes known as patricians and plebeians.
Patricians were wealthy landowners. They owned large estates and slaves, and enjoyed large, excessive dinner aprties like their Etruscan predecessors.
The Plebeians were the opposite. They did all the work and pretty much were the basis of the economy. Sometimes, they were able to become rich, but were never able to marry into a higher class.
Their similarity is that they were both free - not necessarily free men, and were not slaves.
Hope this helps!
