Answer:
Untouchability is a social evil because the backward classes are denied the very fundamental rights, which are guaranteed to each and every citizen by the Constitution. ... Untouchability alienates people from the social structure and hinders the progress of the society as a whole
Ethnicity and race used interchangeably, although such use is incorrect and often results in confusion, is true.
<h3>What does AAA stand for?</h3>
American Anthropological Association is one of the world's largest group of scholars and professional organization studying about anthropology. They deal with understanding the human advancing to solve the world problem.
AAA defines race as the natural appearance of human, their visible physical differences. While ethnicity means the cultural belonging. So the statement use of Ethnicity and race interchangeably is incorrect and frequently results in confusion, is True.
Therefore, the above statement is true.
Learn more about AAA statements on race and ethnicity here:
brainly.com/question/25766379
Roses are used in happy places it also can be used to ask for apologies ND also used between couples while cabbages mostly irritates people ND it makes people sad most times
Value added theory is based on the assumption that certain conditions are necessary for the development of a social movement and that each condition contributes to preceding conditions in making a social movement more likely.
<u>Explanation: </u>
The social movement has different relevant stages:
- Operation (failure) of social control
The concept of value added was used in economics, referring increasing value of product in stages of production. It also adds that the conditions needed for the start of a social movement relates to the notion that grievances shared by multiple individuals, groups and organizations are the reasons for the social causes and how to go about reducing these grievances. This also assumes all the individuals being rational, weighing the costs and benefits of participating in such a movement.
The resource mobilization theory revolves around the central notion of the process of exchange of messages for social change from person to another and from a group to another.
Research shows that highlighting does not improve reading comprehension because it does not encourage elaborative processing of the material.
While highlighting gets you involved in what you're reading by making you extract the important points, it often becomes a physical mechanism (a repetitive movement of the hand) more than it encourages thinking about what you are highlighting.
According to a study by Sarah Peterson in the 1990s, highlighting only helps when students go back to what they have highlighted and take the time to process it.
