Answer:
P(13,2) = 169
Explanation:
We have to calculate the combinations for left and right shoe considering is not the same having a right shoe blue and left red than having a right shoe rend and a left red.
there are 13 pairs from whcih she will take a single pair:
![P(n,r) = n^{r} \\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28n%2Cr%29%20%3D%20n%5E%7Br%7D%20%5C%5C)
where:
n = number of pair = 13
r = shoes = 2 (one on each foot)
![P(n,r) = 13^{2} \\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28n%2Cr%29%20%3D%2013%5E%7B2%7D%20%5C%5C)
P(13,2) = 169
Answer:
c. 10%
Explanation:
Law Imposes additional 10% tax on early distribution of 401 (k) retirement plan. This law is to discourage the use of retirement fund for other purposes than the retirement plan. Evie want early distribution of her funds so she must pay 10% additional tax on these funds. So option c. 10% is correct for 401(k) retirement plan.
Segmentation is recommended for network design because it enforces physical separation,
where test code could bring down the whole corporate network, which would cause
far more damage and chaos than just crashing the testing LAN if there was no
physical separation. Example scenario would be: If the testing network is
completely isolated, it is not possible for a piece of test code to accidentally
affect the management LAN or back-end processing LAN. It might affect the whole
testing network, but it will be isolated to that one segment.
Answer:
Break even point in units:
Yankee: 153,300
Zoro: 65,700
Explanation:
weighted Yankee contribution: $ 60 x 70% = $ 42
weighted Zoro contribution: $ 50 x 30% = $ 15
Mix contribution: $ 57
Then, calcualte the break even point at which the company afford his 12,483,000 fixed cost:
![\frac{Fixed\:Cost}{Contribution \:Margin} = Break\: Even\: Point_{units}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BFixed%5C%3ACost%7D%7BContribution%20%5C%3AMargin%7D%20%3D%20Break%5C%3A%20Even%5C%3A%20Point_%7Bunits%7D)
12,483,000 / 57 = 219,000 sales mix units
<u>we now assing the weight to each one:</u>
Yankee: 219,000 x 70% = 153,300
Zoro: 219,000 x 30% = 65,700
Answer:
the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced depends on how much of each good is being produced.
Explanation:
the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced is constant.
If it were constant, the opportunity cost would be constant thus, the production possibilities frontier would be linear.
the rate of tradeoff between the two goods being produced depends on how much of each good is being produced.
That's because of the diminishing return theory.
As more input goes for the production of a certain good, there will be certain facotr which are as efficient as other.
If the economy does a better use of trade and diversify according to the efficiency of the factor will get more overall production with a mix of product than producing a single one