Anna will pay $16.39 for all of the groceries :)
The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
Since 58 for vanilla and 28 for chocolate
The ratio would be 28:58
You can simplify it even further
to 14:29
Set this up as a proportion.
400/15 = x/6
Solve for x.
I just hope to help! :)
To make the equation easier so that you don't have to use fractions.
