1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SashulF [63]
3 years ago
13

Today, nearly all medical students must perform a human dissection. People volunteer to donate their bodies for study after thei

r death. Body donation was not a practice during the Renaissance. Artists and scientists such as Vesalius and da Vinci dissected the bodies of executed criminals. The criminals had not given their permission for this.
Do you think it was okay for Renaissance researchers to dissect human bodies without permission? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Consent, in all things, is good. While medical knowledge is important, people have and should retain control of their body unless they give consent to the contrary.

You might be interested in
It was by becoming a Catholic that I pacified the Vendée [region in western France], and a [Muslim] that I established myself in
Readme [11.4K]

Human autonomy is the key concept of Enlightenment ideas. This passage relates to those ideas because Napoleon is refering to the importance of reason over beliefs. When he says "the souls of men proceed along different roads" he is also claiming that any religion is valid to feel close to the creator. In a sense Napoleon makes reference to secularization (the idea of religion and politics should be separated and that one's method of worship should be a private matter). That is why he claims that he could be Catholic, Muslim, or Jew.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When the United States Constitution was being considered for ratification, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists disagreed about
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

F. the need to add a Bill of Rights. The Federalists didn't want to add the Bill of Rights because they thought that the new constitution would be enough while the Anti-Federalists thought that the new government would threaten individual liberties if there wasn't a Bill of Rights

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Who fought in the war of 1812?
tamaranim1 [39]
Your answer is  andrew jackson 
5 0
4 years ago
Differentiating between the past, present, and future is an example of _____. A. historical narrative
Rasek [7]
Past means -ed. Present means am, is, are and -ing. Future means not yet happened
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were three provisions of the treaty of versailles?
RSB [31]
Punishment for Germany
Germany takes total blame for WWl
Germany required to pay the $300million for everything destroyed in WWl
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Principals of thr constution ​
    15·1 answer
  • NEED HELP ASAP
    6·2 answers
  • Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s leadership enforced strict religious and social values in
    13·1 answer
  • How was the Huang civilization like Egyptian civilization?
    9·1 answer
  • History: help me pleaseeeeee
    10·1 answer
  • What were the results of the treaty of Versailles
    12·1 answer
  • Which NASA space center is located near Houston? a. Kennedy Space Center b. Marshall Space Center c. Goddard Space Center d. Joh
    5·1 answer
  • Which two groups were left behind and trapped in a cycle of debt during 2 points
    14·1 answer
  • What are some advantages to having a single currency throughout the most of the EU
    11·1 answer
  • Match each thinker with the correct description.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!