1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sammy [17]
3 years ago
10

According to the constitution, who was the commander in chief of the military?

History
2 answers:
Natalija [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:  The President

The founding fathers wanted civilian control of the military. A "civilian" means someone who is not a member of the military.  Some presidents have formerly served in the military, but as elected officials in the White House, they are serving as civilians in that office.

A prominent stand-off over the President's authority over the military occurred during the presidency of Dwight Eisenhower.  Eisenhower had been a military general himself (during World War II), but then was elected to serve as civilian commander in chief as President of the United States.  In 1950, when North Korean forces invaded South Korea,General Douglas MacArthur wanted to bomb the People's Republic of China and use Nationalist Chinese forces from Taiwan also in an attack on communist China.  President Eisenhower would not grant these requests to escalate the war, and MacArthur made his opposition to Truman's policies a public argument.  Eisenhower felt he had to relieve MacArthur of his command and maintain respect for civilian control of the military, with the President as Commander-in-Chief.

makvit [3.9K]3 years ago
3 0
Im pretty sure its the president
You might be interested in
Compare the Parliamentary and Presidential forms of Government with reference to India and the U.S.A.​
Ksivusya [100]

The presidential system selects a head of government independently of the legislature, while in contrast, the head of government in a parliamentary system answers directly to the legislature. Presidential systems necessarily operate under the regulations of separation of powers, while parliamentary methods do not.

<h3>What is the presidential state of government give an example?</h3>

A presidential system is a method of government where a head of government is also head of state and shows an executive branch that is different from the legislative branch. The United States, for instance, has a presidential system.

<h3>What is the difference of parliamentary and presidential?</h3>

In a parliamentary form of government, the powers are divided between the little head and the real head of the state. In a presidential form of government on the other hand the forces are concentrated in the hands of the single executive or the President of the nation.

To learn more about presidential system, refer

brainly.com/question/15453662

#SPJ9

6 0
2 years ago
In Japan, Shinto and Buddhist beliefs coexist and many people are both. true or false
victus00 [196]

The answer is True!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZ HELP! Which TWO scenarios represent pull factors of migration?
ipn [44]
1 and 4 are
pull factors of migration .
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who will win trump or biden
Monica [59]

Answer: I think Biden

Explanation:

Because he’s less hated

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Before the Industrial Revolution, why did the population in Europe “hardly grow?”
AlladinOne [14]

Conditions before the Industrial Revolution were terrible. Child mortality was high and the children who survived, barely had enough to eat. You see, because of The Little Ice Age, agriculture was terrible. And before the revolution, most of Europe was agriculture based. The lack of food made people stunted and killed many. The food that could be harvested, were taxed and there was almost no profit.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain why sectionalism was so widespread in the southern states?
    9·1 answer
  • Where did the USSR have a direct influence in spreading communism?
    10·1 answer
  • Which tribe used only route to get to the Indian territory?
    10·1 answer
  • Why Robert Fulton was important?
    12·2 answers
  • Describe how the British governed the colonies before 1760 and after 1760
    10·1 answer
  • What finally convinced the Japanese to surrender
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELPPP
    10·1 answer
  • How did the scientists discover that they resorted to cannibalism?
    7·2 answers
  • Why didn’t the Portuguese have access to the territory that is present-day Latin and North America?
    8·1 answer
  • What is Apartheid? Question 3 options: a system of segregation and discrimination a system of work problems.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!