Answer:
D. Juror 8 was consistent and used systematic arguments in his persuasion
Explanation:
Twelve Angry Men is about a jury, that must give a verdict in a murder trial.
In order to make a verdict, every juror must agree about the defendant being guilty or innocent.
However, in the movie, juror 8 is the only person to believe the defendant is innocent. As juror 8 defends his verdict of not guilty, other juror start to question their own ethics, prejudices, intelligence and thought.
In conclusion, as more juror changed their verdicts, there is an increased pressure for the other juror to change theirs as well.
Answer:
Hmmmm, oh yeah! I dont understand s*it!
Answer:
provide a release for Greek overpopulation, land hunger, and political unrest
gathered food and supplies find good farmland in a safe area
Explanation:
Answer: Option E - All of the above
Explanation:
The Chief Justice of supreme court,
Warren E. Burger, affirmed Miller's conviction and concluded that the material were obscene since it depicts sexual conduct in artistic way, lack literary, politics, scientific value, violates "global standards of decency", and also encourages lewd and lascivious thought.
Answer:
during the 1700's the American Revolution was a ongoing battle between Patriots and loyalists. It was a very tough time for the Patriots at the start because they were disorganized and uncivilized (classified as rebels). Where loyalists believed that British rule was better. But it was very hard during that time to be a patriot since you were living a ongoing loss.
