Answer:
Argument Detailing Roosevelt was not justified:
Roosevelt Put thousands of Japanese citizens of the US into Internment camps, initially ending Japanese freedom in the US. Now, I could see this as an act to prevent Japanese sabotage in the United states however, This act ended Japanese Business, Japanese dreams of success. This was effectively one of roosevelts worst descisions. Roosevelt justified the order on the area of military necessity, declaring that Japanese Americans were a threat to national security. This was not justified at all! How could every Japanese citizen collude with its government? I think that Roosevelt was blindsided by the suprise attack just like every american and treated the japanese nationality with hostility and disrespect!
Argument Detailing Roosevelt was Justified: He was very justified. We were talking peace with the Japanese before the pearl harbor attacks,trying to find a solution to our deteriorating relations, Thousands of american Sailors and marines died that day and the Japanese could attack from inside the US using Sabotage and spies, Many Japanese agreed with Imperialistic Japanese views! They believed Japan should be a Great empire with vast territory and a large army. The only way to stop an entire attack from inside the US was to put Japanese citizens in these internment camps!
Answer:
The generality of Article III of the Constitution raised questions that Congress had to address in the Judiciary Act of 1789. These questions had no easy answers, and the solutions to them were achieved politically. The First Congress decided that it could regulate the jurisdiction of all Federal courts, and in the Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress established with great particularity a limited jurisdiction for the district and circuit courts, gave the Supreme Court the original jurisdiction provided for in the Constitution, and granted the Court appellate jurisdiction in cases from the Federal circuit courts and from the state courts where those courts rulings had rejected Federal claims. The decision to grant Federal courts a jurisdiction more restrictive than that allowed by the Constitution represented a recognition by the Congress that the people of the United States would not find a full-blown Federal court system palatable at that time.
For nearly all of the next century the judicial system remained essentially as established by the Judiciary Act of 1789. Only after the country had expanded across a continent and had been torn apart by civil war were major changes made. A separate tier of appellate circuit courts created in 1891 removed the burden of circuit riding from the shoulders of the Supreme Court justices, but otherwise left intact the judicial structure.
Explanation:
i hope this helps
Answer:
Citizens are allowed to vote at 18 years old in the United States ( second choice)
