<span>The main difference of both empires is that, the Aryans were peaceful and the Mauryans were warriors. Aryan is a term that means “noble” and was used by ancient Indo-Iranian people as a self-designation. Their beliefs were rooted on religious, cultural, and linguistic focus. While the Mauryans were a group of people who are geographically extensive and powerful with their political and military empires in India. They defeated the empire of Alexander the Great in Macedonia and Persia during 316 BCE.<span>
</span></span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the list. Without the list, we do not know the reference to support the notion of the Declaration as a lawyer's brief.
However, in order to help you, we can answer in the following general terms.
The Declaration of US Independence can be compared to a lawyer's brief, which is an outline of the claims and the evidence the lawyer will present in a case.
We can set the example of the following lines of the Declaration: <em>"The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance.."</em>
In this portion of the Declaration, we can see how a lawyer could have stated the reasons why the King of England was oppressing the 12 American colonists
The Declaration of Independence was promulgated on July 4, 1776, and was immediately adopted by the Continental Congress. It was drafted by Thomas Jefferson, with the help of John Adams, Robert Livingstone, Benjamin Franklin, and Roger Sherman.
Answer:
so nobody found out that he was killing christans
Explanation:
Answer:
When English settlers arrived on the North American continent to start their lives anew, many of them gave little thought to the native peoples who had long inhabited these lands. The Puritan colonists who arrived in the Connecticut River Valley in the early 17th century quickly learned the benefits and necessities of trade and co-existence with the Pequot and other native groups. An initial period of accommodation and cultural mixing, however, turned bitter as the groups clashed over conflicting views of property, nature, division of labor, and the principles of warfare. Massacre at Mystic traces relations between these groups through the lens of a single day. On May 26, 1637 the English retaliated against the murder of one of their ownby viciously attacking a Pequot encampment. As this documentary explores this massacre, it captures the fateful consequences of these divergent worldviews and the tragic legacy left in its wake. Massacre at Mysticis a dramatic retelling of the development of Puritan and Pequot relationships. Historians and Pequot descendents offer thoughtful commentary based on primary research and up-to-date historical interpretation. While there may have been a period of time in which Europeans and Native Americans could have built a cooperative society together, Massacre at Mysticuses this smaller story as a gripping example of why violence and force prevailed rather than co-existence. Rather than a simple tale of defeat, this program follows the present day Pequot as they have reconstructed a community based on new business enterprises and cultural endeavors. This program is an excellent historical lesson in understanding the development of the early colonies, the devastation of Native American peoples, and the patterns set during these formative years of contact.Curriculum Links:
Massacre at Mysticwould be an excellent addition to any middle school or high school class on American History, European History, World History, Environmental Studies, the History of Agriculture and Science and Technology. It fulfills the following standards as outlined by the National Council for History Education: (1) Civilization, cultural diffusion, and innovation, (2) Conflict and cooperation, and (3) Human interaction with the environment
Explanation: